External Validation of a Laboratory Prediction Algorithm for the Reduction of Unnecessary Labs in the Critical Care Setting - 24/05/22
, Tongtong Huang, MCS b, Elmer V. Bernstam, MD, MSE, MS b, c, Xiaoqian Jiang, PhD bAbstract |
Background |
Unnecessary laboratory tests contribute to iatrogenic harm and are a major source of waste in the health care system. We previously developed a machine learning algorithm to help clinicians identify unnecessary laboratory tests, but it has not been externally validated. In this study, we externally validate our machine learning algorithm.
Methods |
To externally validate the machine learning algorithm that was originally trained on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database, we tested the algorithm in a separate institution. We identified and abstracted data for all patients older than 18 years admitted to the intensive care unit at Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston, Texas (MHH) from January 1, 2020 to November 13, 2020. Using the transfer learning style, we performed external validation of the machine learning algorithm.
Results |
A total of 651 MHH patients were included. The model performed well in predicting abnormality (area under the curve [AUC] 0.98 for MIMIC III and 0.89 for MHH). The model performed similarly in predicting transitions from normal laboratory range to abnormal (AUC 0.71 for MIMIC III and 0.70 for MHH). The performance of the model in predicting the actual laboratory value was also similar in the MIMIC III (accuracy 0.41) and MHH data (0.45).
Conclusions |
We externally validated the machine learning model and showed that the model performed similarly, supporting the generalizability to other settings. While this model demonstrated good performance for predicting abnormal labs and transitions, it does not perform well enough for prediction of laboratory values in most clinical applications.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Critical care patients, External validation, Laboratory prediction, Machine learning, Predictive analytics
Esquema
| Funding: This work was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) under awards U01TR002062, UL1TR000371 and U01TR002393; the National Institute of Aging (NIA) under award (R01AG066749), the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT), under award RP170668, RR180012 and the Reynolds and Reynolds Professorship in Clinical Informatics. |
|
| Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no competing interests or financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. |
|
| Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in the manuscript writing. LTL: Conceptualization, project administration, roles/writing – original draft. TH: Data curation, formal analysis, validation; writing – review & editing. EVB: Conceptualization, resources, writing – review & editing. XJ: Conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, supervision, writing – review & editing. |
Vol 135 - N° 6
P. 769-774 - juin 2022 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
