Suscribirse

Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study - 02/06/21

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00213-8 
Leticia Monin, PhD a, *, Adam G Laing, PhD b, *, Miguel Muñoz-Ruiz, PhD a, *, Duncan R McKenzie, PhD a, *, Irene del Molino del Barrio, PhD b, c, *, Thanussuyah Alaguthurai, MSc d, e, *, Clara Domingo-Vila, BSc b, Thomas S Hayday, PhD b, Carl Graham, PhD d, f, Jeffrey Seow, PhD f, Sultan Abdul-Jawad, PhD d, Shraddha Kamdar, PhD b, Elizabeth Harvey-Jones, MBChB e, Rosalind Graham, PhD d, Jack Cooper, MBChB g, Muhammad Khan, MRCP g, Jennifer Vidler, MRCP h, Helen Kakkassery, BSc d, Shubhankar Sinha, BSc d, Richard Davis, MSc b, Liane Dupont, PhD e, Isaac Francos Quijorna, PhD j, Charlotte O’Brien-Gore, MSc d, Puay Ling Lee, BSc a, Josephine Eum, MSc b, Maria Conde Poole, MSc b, Magdalene Joseph, BMBCh b, Daniel Davies, MBBS b, i, Yin Wu, PhD b, d, Angela Swampillai, PhD g, Bernard V North, PhD k, Ana Montes, PhD g, Mark Harries, PhD g, Anne Rigg, PhD g, James Spicer, FRCP d, g, Michael H Malim, DPhil f, Paul Fields, PhD d, g, Piers Patten, PhD d, h, Francesca Di Rosa, MD l, Sophie Papa, PhD d, g, Timothy Tree, PhD b, Katie J Doores, DPhil f, Adrian C Hayday, PhD a, b, *, , Sheeba Irshad, PhD d, e, g, *,
a The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK 
b Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK 
c UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK 
d Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK 
e Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King’s College London, London, UK 
f Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK 
g Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
h Department of Haematological Medicine, King’s College Hospital, London, UK 
i Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
j Regeneration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK 
k Clinical Trials Unit, King’s College London, London, UK 
l Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Research Council of Italy, Rome, Italy 

* Correspondence to: Dr Sheeba Irshad, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK Comprehensive Cancer Centre School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences King’s College London London SE1 9RT UK

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Summary

Background

The efficacy and safety profiles of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer is unknown. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) vaccine in patients with cancer.

Methods

For this prospective observational study, we recruited patients with cancer and healthy controls (mostly health-care workers) from three London hospitals between Dec 8, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021. Participants who were vaccinated between Dec 8 and Dec 29, 2020, received two 30 μg doses of BNT162b2 administered intramuscularly 21 days apart; patients vaccinated after this date received only one 30 μg dose with a planned follow-up boost at 12 weeks. Blood samples were taken before vaccination and at 3 weeks and 5 weeks after the first vaccination. Where possible, serial nasopharyngeal real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) swab tests were done every 10 days or in cases of symptomatic COVID-19. The coprimary endpoints were seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein in patients with cancer following the first vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine and the effect of vaccine boosting after 21 days on seroconversion. All participants with available data were included in the safety and immunogenicity analyses. Ongoing follow-up is underway for further blood sampling after the delayed (12-week) vaccine boost. This study is registered with the NHS Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (REC ID 20/HRA/2031).

Findings

151 patients with cancer (95 patients with solid cancer and 56 patients with haematological cancer) and 54 healthy controls were enrolled. For this interim data analysis of the safety and immunogenicity of vaccinated patients with cancer, samples and data obtained up to March 19, 2021, were analysed. After exclusion of 17 patients who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (detected by either antibody seroconversion or a positive rRT-PCR COVID-19 swab test) from the immunogenicity analysis, the proportion of positive anti-S IgG titres at approximately 21 days following a single vaccine inoculum across the three cohorts were 32 (94%; 95% CI 81–98) of 34 healthy controls; 21 (38%; 26–51) of 56 patients with solid cancer, and eight (18%; 10–32) of 44 patients with haematological cancer. 16 healthy controls, 25 patients with solid cancer, and six patients with haematological cancer received a second dose on day 21. Of the patients with available blood samples 2 weeks following a 21-day vaccine boost, and excluding 17 participants with evidence of previous natural SARS-CoV-2 exposure, 18 (95%; 95% CI 75–99) of 19 patients with solid cancer, 12 (100%; 76–100) of 12 healthy controls, and three (60%; 23–88) of five patients with haematological cancers were seropositive, compared with ten (30%; 17–47) of 33, 18 (86%; 65–95) of 21, and four (11%; 4–25) of 36, respectively, who did not receive a boost. The vaccine was well tolerated; no toxicities were reported in 75 (54%) of 140 patients with cancer following the first dose of BNT162b2, and in 22 (71%) of 31 patients with cancer following the second dose. Similarly, no toxicities were reported in 15 (38%) of 40 healthy controls after the first dose and in five (31%) of 16 after the second dose. Injection-site pain within 7 days following the first dose was the most commonly reported local reaction (23 [35%] of 65 patients with cancer; 12 [48%] of 25 healthy controls). No vaccine-related deaths were reported.

Interpretation

In patients with cancer, one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine yields poor efficacy. Immunogenicity increased significantly in patients with solid cancer within 2 weeks of a vaccine boost at day 21 after the first dose. These data support prioritisation of patients with cancer for an early (day 21) second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine.

Funding

King’s College London, Cancer Research UK, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, and Francis Crick Institute.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


© 2021  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 22 - N° 6

P. 765-778 - juin 2021 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • BRCA2: a 25-year journey from gene identification to targeted cancer treatment
  • Thomas Grinda, Suzette Delaloge
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (DESTINY-CRC01): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial
  • Salvatore Siena, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Kanwal Raghav, Toshiki Masuishi, Fotios Loupakis, Hisato Kawakami, Kensei Yamaguchi, Tomohiro Nishina, Marwan Fakih, Elena Elez, Javier Rodriguez, Fortunato Ciardiello, Yoshito Komatsu, Taito Esaki, Ki Chung, Zev Wainberg, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Kapil Saxena, Eriko Yamamoto, Emarjola Bako, Yasuyuki Okuda, Javad Shahidi, Axel Grothey, Takayuki Yoshino, DESTINY-CRC01 investigators

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.