Suscribirse

Arthroscopic capsular release to treat idiopathic frozen shoulder: How much release is needed? - 30/01/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102766 
Harish Sivasubramanian, Chen Xi Kasia Chua , Sheng Yang Lim, Ruben Manohara, Zhao Wen Dennis Ng, Prem Kumar V, Keng Soon Poh
 University Orthopaedics, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgical Cluster, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 11, 119228 Singapore, Singapore 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide consensus regarding the degree of optimal extended arthroscopic capsular release in addition to a standard rotator interval release in the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder.

Materials and methods

The systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All articles that reported the outcomes of capsular release in idiopathic frozen shoulder were included. A total of 18 articles with 629 patients and 811 shoulders were included. Clinical outcomes analysed include differences between pre and postoperative ranges of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Score (VAS) reduction, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores and Constant scores. Patients were grouped by technique: anterior-inferior capsular release (Group 1), anterior-inferior-posterior capsular release (Group 2), and 360-degree capsular release (Group 3) at follow up points 3,6 and 12 months.

Results

Comparing ROM, Group 1 had greater early abduction (p<0.01), early (p<0.01) and overall external rotation (p<0.01) than Group 2, as well as greater early flexion (p<0.01), early abduction (p<0.01), early (p<0.01) and overall internal rotation (p<0.01) than Group 3. Group 2 had greater early (p=0.03) and overall flexion (p<0.01) than Group 1, as well as greater early (p<0.01) and overall flexion (p<0.01), early abduction (p<0.01) and early internal rotation (p<0.01) than Group 3. Group 3 had greater overall flexion (p<0.01) than Group 1 and greater overall external rotation (p<0.01) than Group 2.

Comparing VAS scores, the less extensive releases saw the greatest significant postoperative reduction. Group 2 had greater mean improvements in postoperative Constant scores than Group 1 (p<0.01) and Group 3 (p<0.01), while SST scores were significantly higher in Group 1 (p<0.01).

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that less extensive releases may result in better functional and pain scores. Addition of a posterior release offers increased early internal rotation, which was not sustained over time, but provides early and sustained flexion improvements. A complete 360 release may not provide any further benefit. There were no significant differences in the complication rates amongst the 3 techniques.

Level of study

II; Meta-analysis and systematic review.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Adhesive capsulitis, Arthroscopic, Capsular release, Extended, Frozen shoulder, Complications

Abbreviations : VAS, SST


Esquema


© 2020  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 107 - N° 1

Artículo 102766- février 2021 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Hip arthroscopy in France: An epidemiological study of postoperative care and outcomes involving 3699 patients
  • Elio Disegni, Pierre Martinot, Julien Dartus, Henri Migaud, Sophie Putman, Olivier May, Julien Girard, Emmanuel Chazard
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Osteoarthritis of the shoulder in under-50 year-olds: A multicenter retrospective study of 273 shoulders by the French Society for Shoulder and Elbow (SOFEC)
  • Jean Kany, Tewfik Benkalfate, Luc Favard, Philippe Teissier, Christophe Charousset, Pierre Henri Flurin, Bertrand Coulet, Laurent Hubert, Jérôme Garret, Philippe Valenti, Jean David Werthel, Nicolas Bonnevialle, French Society for Shoulder, Elbow (SOFEC)

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.