Suscribirse

Does labral repair have a clinical benefit during arthroscopic treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement? Prospective multicentre study with 2-year follow-up - 19/11/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.09.002 
Olivier May a, , Karim Ouattara b, Xavier Flecher c, Michael Wettstein d, e
the

Francophone Arthroscopy Society (SFA)f

a Centre de chirurgie de la hanche, Médipole Garonne, 45, rue de Gironis, 31036 Toulouse, France 
b Institut universitaire locomoteur et sport, université Côte d’Azur, CHU Pasteur 2 de Nice, 30, voie Romaine, 06000 Nice, France 
c Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Aix-Marseille University, AP–HM, CNRS, ISM, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, Institute for Locomotion, Marseille, France 
d Institut de traumatologie et d’orthopédie du léman suisse, clinique Genolier, route du Muids 3, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland 
e Service d’orthopedie-traumatologie, HRC centre hospitalier de Rennaz, route du Vieux-Séquoia 20, 1847 Rennaz, Switzerland 
f 15, rue Ampère, 92500 Rueil-Malmaison, France 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Introduction

Hip arthroscopy has emerged as an effective tool for treating labral tears associated with femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI).

Objective

Compare the effectiveness of debridement versus labral repair on functional outcomes at 2 years after hip arthroscopy and evaluate the influence of the repair technique.

Hypothesis

There is no statistical difference in short-term functional outcomes between debridement and repair. The type of repair technique has no influence on functional outcomes.

Methods

From July 2017 to June 2018, a prospective study was done at 10 participating hospitals specialised in hip preservation surgery. Patients over 18 years of age, who underwent hip arthroscopy for a labral tear due to femoro-acetabular impingement, were enrolled. Patients underwent either labral repair or debridement. The labral repairs were performed with either the loop or mattress technique and functional outcomes were evaluated using the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS).

Results

One hundred and eighty-seven patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for FAI were enrolled; 42 (22.5%) underwent labral debridement and 145 (77.5%) underwent labral repair. In the repair group, 66 (46%) were mattress sutures and 79 (54%) were loop sutures. Mean patient age was 33.3±10.3 (18–63) and 38% of patients were women (n=71). Mean follow-up was 16.2 months (10–26.4). The mean NAHS improved from 47.3 to 72.8 (p<0.05) at final follow-up. There was no significant difference between the repair and debridement groups (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the mattress and loop repair subgroups (p>0.05).

Conclusions

There is no statistical difference in short-term functional outcomes between debridement and repair. The type of repair technique has no influence on functional outcomes.

Level of evidence

II, prospective cohort study.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Arthroscopy, Labrum, Repair, Debridement


Esquema


© 2020  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 106 - N° 8S

P. S237-S241 - décembre 2020 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Is patient-specific instrumentation more precise than conventional techniques and navigation in achieving planned correction in high tibial osteotomy?
  • Nicolas Tardy, Camille Steltzlen, Nicolas Bouguennec, Jean-Loup Cartier, Patrice Mertl, Cécile Batailler, Jean-Luc Hanouz, Goulven Rochcongar, Jean-Marie Fayard, Francophone Arthroscopy Society

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.