Sacroiliac joint syndrome after lumbosacral fusion - 23/09/20
, Yann Pelletier a, Hugo Darmante a, Olivier Andréani b, Fernand de Peretti a, Christophe Trojani a
Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.
Conéctese para beneficiarse!
Abstract |
Introduction |
One-third of low back pain cases are due to the sacroiliac (SI) joint. The incidence increases after lumbosacral fusion. A positive Fortin Finger Test points to the SI joint being the origin of the pain; however, clinical examination and imaging are not specific and minimally contributory. The gold standard is a test injection of local anesthetic. More than 70% reduction in pain after this injection confirms the SI joint is the cause of the pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the decrease in pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) after intra-articular injection into the SI joint. We hypothesised that intra-articular SI injection will significantly reduce SI pain after lumbosacral fusion.
Methods |
All patients with pain (NRS>7/10) suspected of being caused by SI joint syndrome 1 year after lumbosacral fusion with positive Fortin test were included. Patients with lumbar or hip pathologies or inflammatory disease of the SI joint were excluded. Each patient underwent a 2D-guided injection of local anesthetic into the SI joint. If this failed, a second 2D-guided injection was done; if this also failed, a third 3D-guided injection was done. Reduction of pain on the NRS by>70% in the first 2 days after the injection confirmed the diagnosis. Whether the injection was intra-articular or not, it was recorded. Ninety-four patients with a mean age of 57 years were included, of which 70% were women.
Results |
Of the 94 patients, 85 had less pain (90%) after one of the three injections. The mean NRS was 8.6/10 (7–10) before the injection and 1.7/10 after the injection (0–3) (p=0.0001). Of the 146 2D-guided injections, 41% were effective and 61% were intra-articular. Of the 34 3D-guided injections, 73% were effective and 100% were intra-articular.
Discussion |
This study found a significant decrease in SI joint-related pain after intra-articular injection into the SI joint in patients who still had pain after lumbosacral fusion. If this injection is non-contributive when CT-guided under local anesthesia, it can be repeated under general anesthesia with 3D O-arm guidance. This diagnostic strategy allowed us to confirm that pain originates in the SI joint after lumbosacral fusion in 9 of 10 patients.
Conclusion |
If the first two CT-guided SI joint injections fail, 3D surgical navigation is an alternative means of doing the injection that helps to significantly reduce SI joint-related pain after lumbosacral fusion.
Level of evidence |
IV, retrospective study.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Sacroiliac joint pain, Lumbosacral fusion, Test injection, Diagnosis
Esquema
Vol 106 - N° 6
P. 1233-1238 - octobre 2020 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente
- Sacrum osteotomy to change pelvic parameters: Surgical technique and 3D modeling
- Marc Khalifé, Pascal Khalifé, Hugues Pascal-Moussellard
- Comments on “Correction des scolioses idiopathiques thoraciques de l’adolescent par action directe et unique sur la tige convexe”, of P. Violas, C. Bryand, C. Gomes, P. Sauleau, G. Lucas, SOO, published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019;105:1171–74
- Federico Solla, Carlo Bertoncelli, Virginie Rampal
Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.