Suscribirse

Age at last screening and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer in older, unvaccinated women: a modelling study - 19/12/18

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30536-9 
Talía Malagón, PhD a, , Shalini Kulasingam, PhD c, Marie-Hélène Mayrand, ProfPhD d, Gina Ogilvie, ProfMD e, Leah Smith, PhD f, Céline Bouchard, MD g, Walter Gotlieb, ProfMD b, Eduardo L Franco, ProfDrPH a
a Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada 
b Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada 
c Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA 
d Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal et CRCHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada 
e Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 
f Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON, Canada 
g Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec City, QC, Canada 

* Correspondence to: Dr Talía Malagón, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A3T2, Canada Division of Cancer Epidemiology Department of Oncology McGill University Montreal QC H4A3T2 Canada

Summary

Background

There is a paucity of empirical evidence to inform the age at which to stop cervical cancer screening. The recommended age to stop screening generally varies between age 50–70 years worldwide. However, cervical cancer incidence and mortality remain high in older women. We used a Markov model of cervical cancer screening to estimate the remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer at different ages and with different exit screening tests, with the aim of informing recommendations of the age at which to stop cervical cancer screening in developed countries.

Methods

For this modelling study, we developed a state transition (Markov) model of cervical cancer natural history and screening. We developed, calibrated, and validated our model using Canadian provincial registries and survey data. To simulate an age-structured population in the model, a new cohort of 236 564 women (one fifth of the population of Canadian women aged 20–24 years in 2012) entered the model every year and were successively modelled in parallel. Successive cohorts entered the model at age 10 years, creating an age-structured population of women aged 10–100 years. Women who had a total hysterectomy were excluded from the analyses. We calibrated our model to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cancer incidence with data from Statistics Canada, which compiles the data from 13 individual provincial registries. We chose a three-stage progressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia model to include differences in management and treatment decisions depending on lesion severity. We modelled infections with four high-risk HPV groups: HPV16 and HPV18; HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, HPV52, and HPV58; HPV35, HPV39, HPV51, HPV56, HPV59, HPV66, and HPV68; and a generic group of other potentially oncogenic HPVs. We estimated 5-year, 10-year, and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer for older, unvaccinated women who stopped screening at different ages and underwent different screening tests.

Findings

Cervical cancer incidence excluding women with hysterectomies underestimated the incidence of cervical cancer in women with a cervix by up to 71% in women aged 80–84 years. Our model predicted that women without HPV vaccination who have been never screened have a 1 in 45 (95% percentile interval 1 in 32 to 1 in 64) lifetime risk of cervical cancer. Perfect adherence (100% of women screened) to cytology screening every 3 years between the ages of 25 years and 69 years could reduce the lifetime risk of cervical cancer to 1 in 532 women (95% percentile interval 1 in 375 to 1 in 820) without HPV vaccination. Increasing the age at which women stopped cytology screening from 55 years to 75 years led to incremental decreases in cancer risk later in life. A 70-year old woman whose screening history was unknown had an average remaining lifetime risk of 1 in 588 (<1%; 95% percentile interval 1 in 451 to 1 in 873) if she stopped screening. Her remaining lifetime risk at age 70 years was reduced to 1 in 1206 (2·0 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 942 to 1 in 1748) if she had a negative cytology test, 1 in 6525 (12·9 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 3167 to 1 in 18 664) if she had a negative HPV test, and 1 in 9550 (18·1 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 4928 to 1 in 23 228) if she had a negative co-test for cytology and HPV.

Interpretation

Cervical cancer risk reductions might be achieved by screening with cytology up to age 75 years, although with diminishing returns. A negative exit oncogenic HPV test or negative HPV test plus cytology correlates with a low remaining lifetime cervical cancer risk for unvaccinated women with a cervix after the age of 55 years.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


© 2018  Elsevier Ltd. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 19 - N° 12

P. 1569-1578 - décembre 2018 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Yale Cancer Center Precision Medicine Tumor Board: one tumour, multiple targets
  • Tyler Stewart, Karin Finberg, Zenta Walther, Jeffrey L Sklar, Navid Hafez, Joseph P Eder, Karen Anderson, Frederick Wilson, Sarah B Goldberg
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study
  • Joe-Elie Salem, Ali Manouchehri, Melissa Moey, Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes, Lisa Bastarache, Antoine Pariente, Aurélien Gobert, Jean-Philippe Spano, Justin M Balko, Marc P Bonaca, Dan M Roden, Douglas B Johnson, Javid J Moslehi

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.