Suscribirse

Delay from Diagnosis to Surgery in Transferred Type A Aortic Dissection - 30/12/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.009 
William Froehlich, BS a, Jip L. Tolenaar, MD, PhD b, Kevin M. Harris, MD c, Craig Strauss, MD, MPH c, Thoralf M. Sundt, MD d, Thomas T. Tsai, MD, MSc e, Mark D. Peterson, MD, PhD f, Arturo Evangelista, MD g, Daniel G. Montgomery, BS a, Eva Kline-Rogers, MS, NP a, Christoph A. Nienaber, MD h, James B. Froehlich, MD, MPH a, Eric M. Isselbacher, MD d, Kim A. Eagle, MD a, Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD b, *
a Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 
b Thoracic Aortic Research Center, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy 
c Cardiovascular Division, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minn 
d Thoracic Aortic Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 
e Cardiology Department, University of Colorado Hospital, Denver 
f Division of Cardiac Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada 
g Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain 
h Cardiology and Aortic Centre, The Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK 

*Requests for reprints should be addressed to Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD, Thoracic Aortic Research Center, Policlinico San Donato IRCCS, University of Milan, Piazza Malan 2, San Donato Milanese, 20097, Italy.Thoracic Aortic Research CenterPoliclinico San Donato IRCCSUniversity of MilanPiazza Malan 2San Donato Milanese20097Italy
En prensa. Pruebas corregidas por el autor. Disponible en línea desde el Saturday 30 December 2017

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this research is to analyze factors associated with delays to surgical management of Type A acute aortic dissection patients.

Methods

Time from diagnosis to surgery and associated factors were evaluated in 1880 surgically managed Type A dissection patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.

Results

The majority of patients were transferred (75.7% vs 24.3%). Patients who were transferred had a median delay from diagnosis to surgery of 4.0 hours (interquartile range 2.5-7.2 hours), compared with 2.3 hours (interquartile range 1.1-4.2 hours; P < .001) in nontransferred patients. Among patients who were transferred, those with worst-ever, posterior, or tearing chest pain those with severe complications, and those receiving transthoracic echocardiogram prior to a transesophageal echocardiogram or as the only echocardiogram were treated more quickly. Those undergoing magnetic resonance imaging, or who had prior cardiac surgery, had longer delays to surgery. Among nontransferred patients, those with coma were treated more quickly. In both groups, patients presenting with emergent conditions such as cardiac tamponade, hypotension, or shock had more rapid treatment. Among transferred patients, surviving patients had longer delays (4.1 [2.6-7.8] hours vs 3.3 [2.0-6.0] hours, P = .001). Overall mortality did not differ between patients who were transferred vs not (19.3% vs 21.1%, P = .416).

Conclusion

Simply being transferred added significantly to the delay to surgery for Type A acute aortic dissection patients, but a number of factors affected its extent. Overall, signs and symptoms leading to a definitive diagnosis or indicating immediate life threat reduced time to surgery, while factors suggesting other diagnoses correlated with delays.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Aortic dissection, Cardiothoracic surgery, Treatment delay


Esquema


 Conflicts of Interest: TS serves on the advisory board of Thrasos. KE has received research grants from W.L. Gore & Associates and Medtronic, Inc. ST has received research grants and nonfinancial support from W.L. Gore & Associates and has served as a speaker and consultant for W.L. Gore & Associates and Medtronic, Inc. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.