Western Osteoporosis Alliance Clinical Practice Series: Evaluating the Balance of Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Osteoporosis Therapies - 27/09/17
, Michael R. McClung, MD b, c, K. Shawn Davison, PhD d, Larry Dian, MBBS e, Steve T. Harris, MD f, Paul D. Miller, MD g, E. Michael Lewiecki, MD h, David L. Kendler, MD iWriting Group for the Western Osteoporosis Alliance
Abstract |
Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that requires life-long strategies to reduce fracture risk. Few trials have investigated the balance of benefits and risk with long-term use of osteoporosis therapies, and fewer still have investigated the consequences of treatment discontinuation. The best available evidence suggests that up to 10 years of treatment with an oral bisphosphonate maintains the degree of fracture risk reduction observed in the 3-year registration trials. With denosumab, 10 years of therapy appears to provide fracture risk reduction similar to or better than that observed in the 3-year registration trial. Available data suggest an increasing but low risk of fractures with atypical features with increasing duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Published data linking duration of therapy to osteonecrosis of the jaw are lacking for bisphosphonates and denosumab. Other side effects associated with denosumab or bisphosphonates do not appear to be related to therapy duration. The antifracture benefits of long-term therapy with bisphosphonates and denosumab in appropriately selected patients outweigh the low risk of serious side effects.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Benefits, Bisphosphonate, Denosumab, Fracture, Long-term therapy, Osteoporosis, Risks
Esquema
| Funding: This review was funded by the Western Osteoporosis Alliance, a not-for-profit Society registered in British Columbia, Canada. |
|
| Conflict of Interest: DLK has received institutional grant/research support from Amgen, Astelis, AstraZenika, and Eli Lilly & Company and he has served on scientific advisory boards and speakers bureaus for Amgen, Merck, Eli Lilly & Company, and Pfizer. KSD has received consulting fees or honorarium from Novartis, Merck and Amgen. LD has served on Speakers' Bureaus for Amgen, Merck, Eli Lilly & Company, Servier and Bayer. DAH has received grant/research support from Amgen, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, and Novartis, as well as the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Pure North S'Energy Foundation. He has served on scientific advisory boards for and received speaking honoraria from Amgen, Merck, and Eli Lilly & Company. STH has provided sponsored presentations for Eli Lilly & Company, Shire and Gilead Sciences and has acted as a consultant to Eli Lilly & Company, Gilead Sciences, Merck, Myovant Sciences and Radius Health. MRM has received consulting fees or honorarium from Amgen and Radius Health. PDM is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards for Alexion, Amgen, AgNovos, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Radius Pharma and Roche and holds research Grants from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Immunodiagnostics, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Merck Serrano, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Radius Pharma, Roche Diagnostics and Takeda. EML has received institutional grant/research support from Amgen, Merck, and Eli Lilly & Company and he has served on scientific advisory boards for Amgen, Merck, Eli Lilly & Company, Radius Health, Alexion and Shire. |
|
| Authorship: All authors had a role in researching and writing this manuscript. |
Vol 130 - N° 7
P. 862.e1-862.e7 - juillet 2017 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
