Suscribirse

Impact of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation on sphincter of Oddi function: a prospective randomized study - 20/04/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.031 
Young Koog Cheon, MD, PhD 1, , Tae Yoon Lee, MD, PhD 1, Soo-Nyung Kim, MD, PhD 2, Chan Sup Shim, MD, PhD 1
1 Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 

Reprint requests: Professor Young Koog Cheon, MD, PhD, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangin-gu, Seoul, 05030, South Korea.Digestive Disease CenterDepartment of Internal MedicineKonkuk University School of Medicine120-1 Neungdong-roGwangin-guSeoul, 05030South Korea

Abstract

Background and Aims

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (≤8 mm in diameter) preserves sphincter of Oddi (SO) function. However, it is still unknown whether papillary function is preserved after endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD, ≥12 mm in diameter). We investigated SO function after EPLBD with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) by endoscopic manometry, up to 1 year after the procedure.

Methods

This was a prospective randomized study involving patients with bile duct stones ≥12 mm. Eighty-six patients who met the inclusion criteria were assigned randomly to either EPLBD alone or EST with EPLBD, and endoscopic manometric studies were performed. The primary outcome was comparison of the manometric data between the 2 groups and within each group both 1 week and 1 year after the procedure.

Results

One week after EPLBD alone and EST with EPLBD, the basal pressure of SO dropped from 30.4 (8.2) to 6.4 (8.4) mm Hg (P < .001) and 29.5 (18.9) to 2.9 (3.6) mm Hg (P < .001), respectively. SO function was not recovered at 1 year; the manometric measurements were similar to those taken at the 1-week time point in both groups. Similar outcomes were obtained in patients with EPLBD alone compared with those with EST and EPLBD, including the initial stone clearance rate (95.2% vs 97.7%, P = .612), the frequency of mechanical lithotripsy (21.4% vs 13.6%), and overall adverse events (11.9% vs 13.6%, P = 1.0) including the rate of pancreatitis after the procedure (7.1% vs 11.4%, P = .714). During an overall median follow-up of 17.8 months, the recurrence rate of bile duct stones was 16.7% in patients who underwent EPLBD alone and 15.9% in patients who underwent EST with EPLBD (P = .924).

Conclusions

Both EPLBD alone and EST + EPLBD resulted in persistent and comparable loss of SO function after 1 year. EPLBD alone has similar efficacy and safety to those of EST with EPLBD with respect to removal of large stones.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations : ANOVA, CBD, EPBD, EPLBD, EST, GB, IQR, ML, SD, SO, SOM


Esquema


 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.


© 2017  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 85 - N° 4

P. 782 - avril 2017 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Cost utility of ERCP-based modalities for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis
  • Basile Njei, Thomas R. McCarty, Shyam Varadarajulu, Udayakumar Navaneethan
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Can we preserve sphincter of Oddi function by avoiding sphincterotomy? Do we want to?
  • Alejandro L. Suarez, Gregory A. Coté

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.