Internal fixation of intra-capsular proximal femoral fractures in patients older than 80 years: Still relevant? Multivariate analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort - 08/02/17
the
SoFCOTh
Abstract |
Background |
Arthroplasty is now widely used to treat intra-capsular proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) in older patients, even when there is little or no displacement. However, whether arthroplasty is associated with lower mortality and complication rates in non-displaced or mildly displaced PFFs is unknown. The objectives of this prospective study were: (1) to evaluate early mortality rates with the two treatment methods, (2) to identify risk factors for complications, (3) and to identify predictors of functional decline.
Hypothesis |
Arthroplasty and internal fixation produce similar outcomes in non-displaced fractures of patients older than 80 years with PFFs.
Material and methods |
This multicentre prospective study included consecutive patients older than 80 years who were managed for intra-capsular PFFs at eight centres in 2014. Biometric data and geriatric assessment scores (Parker Mobility Score, Katz Index of Independence, and Mini-Nutritional Assessment [MNA] score) were collected before and 6 months after surgery. Independent risk factors were sought by multivariate analysis. We included 418 females and 124 males with a mean age of 87±4years. The distribution of Garden stages was stage I, n=56; stage II, n=33; stage III, n=130; and stage IV, n=323. Arthroplasty was performed in 494 patients and internal fixation in 48 patients with non-displaced intra-capsular PFFs.
Results |
Mortality after 6 months was 16.4% overall, with no significant difference between the two groups. By multivariate analysis, two factors were significantly associated with higher mortality, namely, male gender (odds ratio [OR], 3.24; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.0–5.84; P<0.0001) and high ASA score (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.07–2.26; P=0.019). Two factors were independently associated with lower mortality, with 75% predictive value, namely, high haematocrit (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7–0.9; P=0.001) and better Parker score (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3–0.8; P=0.01). The cut-off values associated with a significant risk increase were 2 for the Parker score (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1–2.3; P=0.001) and 37% for the haematocrit (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9–5.5; P=0.02). Complications occurred in 5.5% of patients. Surgical site infections were seen in 1.4% of patients, all of whom had had arthroplasty. Blood loss was significantly greater with arthroplasty (311±197mL versus 201±165mL, P<0.0002). Dependency worsened in 39% of patients, and 31% of patients lost self-sufficiency. A higher preoperative Parker score was associated with a lower risk of high postoperative dependency (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76–0.97; P=0.014).
Discussion |
Neither treatment method was associated with decreased mortality or better function after intra-capsular PFFs in patients older than 80 years. Early mortality rates were consistent with previous reports. Among the risk factors identified in this study, age, preoperative self-sufficiency, and gender are not amenable to modification, in contrast to haematocrit and blood loss.
Conclusion |
Internal fixation remains warranted in patients older than 80 years with non-displaced intra-capsular PFFs.
Level of evidence |
III, prospective case-control study.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Femoral neck fracture, Nutritional status, Autonomy, Aging
Esquema
Vol 103 - N° 1
P. 3-7 - février 2017 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.