Suscribirse

Electronic Alerts, Comparative Practitioner Metrics, and Education Improves Thromboprophylaxis and Reduces Thrombosis - 25/09/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.014 
Scott C. Woller, MD a, b, , Scott M. Stevens, MD a, b, R. Scott Evans, PhD c, d, Daniel G. Wray, MS, MBA e, John C. Christensen, MD a, b, Valerie T. Aston, BS a, Matthew H. Wayne, MBA f, James F. Lloyd, BS c, Emily L. Wilson, MS g, C. Gregory Elliott, MD a, b
a Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah 
b Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 
c Department of Medical Informatics, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah 
d Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 
e Twine Clinical Consulting, LLC, Park City, Utah 
f Medical Impact Ventures, LLC, Austin, Tex 
g Division of Statistics, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Scott C. Woller, MD, Eccles Outpatient Care Center, 5121 Cottonwood Street, PO Box 57700, Murray, UT 84157-7000.Eccles Outpatient Care Center5121 Cottonwood Street, PO Box 57700MurrayUT84157-7000

Abstract

Background

Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis remains underutilized in hospitalized medical patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. We assessed the effect of a health care quality-improvement initiative comprised of a targeted electronic alert, comparative practitioner metrics, and practitioner-specific continuing medical education on the rate of appropriate venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis provided to medical inpatients at high risk for venous thromboembolism.

Methods

We performed a multicenter prospective observational cohort study in an urban Utah hospital system. All medical patients admitted to 1 of 2 participating hospitals from April 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012 were eligible. Patients were members of the “control” (April 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010), “intervention” (January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011), or “subsequent year” (January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012) group. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate chemoprophylaxis among patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, all-cause mortality, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, physician satisfaction, and alert fatigue.

Results

The rate of appropriate chemoprophylaxis among patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism increased (66.1% control period vs 81.0% intervention period vs 88.1% subsequent year; P <.001 for each comparison). A significant reduction of 90-day symptomatic venous thromboembolism accompanied the quality initiative (9.3% control period, 9.7% intervention period, 6.7% subsequent year; P = .009); 30-day venous thromboembolism rates also significantly decreased.

Conclusions

A multifaceted intervention was associated with increased appropriate venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis among medical inpatients at high risk for venous thromboembolism and reduced symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The effect of the intervention was sustained.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Chemoprophylaxis medical patient, Prevention, Quality improvement, Venous thromboembolism


Esquema


 Funding: Grant support was received from Twine Clinical Consulting LLC (Park City, Utah) and the Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation (Salt Lake City, Utah; Grant #610).
 Conflict of Interest: SCW and SMS report grant support from Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, Iverson Genetics, and Twine Clinical Consulting LLC paid to Intermountain Healthcare; CGE reports personal fees from Janssen Research & Development; DW and MW report financial support provided by GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, and Sanofi Aventis; JC, JFL, RSE, VTA and ELW report none.
 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript. SCW, take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


© 2016  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 129 - N° 10

P. 1124.e17-1124.e26 - octobre 2016 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Impact of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization on Mobility Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
  • Cynthia J. Brown, Richard E. Kennedy, Alexander X. Lo, Courtney P. Williams, Patricia Sawyer
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Patients Have a Right to All Their Medical Test Results
  • David L. Keller

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.