Suscribirse

Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial - 01/08/16

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30102-4 
David Dearnaley, ProfFRCR a, b, , Isabel Syndikus, MD c, Helen Mossop, MMathStat a, Vincent Khoo, MD a, b, Alison Birtle, FRCR d, David Bloomfield, FRCR e, John Graham, FRCR f, Peter Kirkbride, FRCR g, John Logue, FRCR h, Zafar Malik, FRCR c, Julian Money-Kyrle, FRCR i, Joe M O’Sullivan, ProfFRCR j, Miguel Panades, MRCR k, Chris Parker, FRCR a, b, Helen Patterson, FRCR l, , Christopher Scrase, FRCR m, John Staffurth, MD n, Andrew Stockdale, FRCR o, Jean Tremlett, MSc e, Margaret Bidmead, MSc b, Helen Mayles, MSc c, Olivia Naismith, MSc b, Chris South, PhD i, Annie Gao, MSc a, b, Clare Cruickshank, BSc[Hons] a, Shama Hassan, MSc a, Julia Pugh, CIM Dip a, Clare Griffin, MSc a, Emma Hall, PhD a
on behalf of the

CHHiP Investigators

a The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK 
b Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
c Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK 
d Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK 
e Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK 
f Beacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK 
g Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK 
h Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK 
i Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK 
j Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK 
k Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK 
l Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK 
m Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK 
n Cardiff University/Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK 
o University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof David Dearnaley, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK Correspondence to: Prof David Dearnaley The Institute of Cancer Research 15 Cotswold Road London SM2 5NG UK

Summary

Background

Prostate cancer might have high radiation-fraction sensitivity that would give a therapeutic advantage to hypofractionated treatment. We present a pre-planned analysis of the efficacy and side-effects of a randomised trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy after 5 years follow-up.

Methods

CHHiP is a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial that recruited men with localised prostate cancer (pT1b–T3aN0M0). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to conventional (74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions over 7·4 weeks) or one of two hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks or 57 Gy in 19 fractions over 3·8 weeks) all delivered with intensity-modulated techniques. Most patients were given radiotherapy with 3–6 months of neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen suppression. Randomisation was by computer-generated random permuted blocks, stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group and radiotherapy treatment centre, and treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical or clinical failure; the critical hazard ratio (HR) for non-inferiority was 1·208. Analysis was by intention to treat. Long-term follow-up continues. The CHHiP trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN97182923.

Findings

Between Oct 18, 2002, and June 17, 2011, 3216 men were enrolled from 71 centres and randomly assigned (74 Gy group, 1065 patients; 60 Gy group, 1074 patients; 57 Gy group, 1077 patients). Median follow-up was 62·4 months (IQR 53·9–77·0). The proportion of patients who were biochemical or clinical failure free at 5 years was 88·3% (95% CI 86·0–90·2) in the 74 Gy group, 90·6% (88·5–92·3) in the 60 Gy group, and 85·9% (83·4–88·0) in the 57 Gy group. 60 Gy was non-inferior to 74 Gy (HR 0·84 [90% CI 0·68–1·03], pNI=0·0018) but non-inferiority could not be claimed for 57 Gy compared with 74 Gy (HR 1·20 [0·99–1·46], pNI=0·48). Long-term side-effects were similar in the hypofractionated groups compared with the conventional group. There were no significant differences in either the proportion or cumulative incidence of side-effects 5 years after treatment using three clinician-reported as well as patient-reported outcome measures. The estimated cumulative 5 year incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse bowel and bladder adverse events was 13·7% (111 events) and 9·1% (66 events) in the 74 Gy group, 11·9% (105 events) and 11·7% (88 events) in the 60 Gy group, 11·3% (95 events) and 6·6% (57 events) in the 57 Gy group, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Interpretation

Hypofractionated radiotherapy using 60 Gy in 20 fractions is non-inferior to conventional fractionation using 74 Gy in 37 fractions and is recommended as a new standard of care for external-beam radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer.

Funding

Cancer Research UK, Department of Health, and the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


© 2016  Dearnaley et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 17 - N° 8

P. 1047-1060 - août 2016 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • The C Word
  • Jocalyn Clark
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial
  • Luca Incrocci, Ruud C Wortel, Wendimagegn Ghidey Alemayehu, Shafak Aluwini, Erik Schimmel, Stijn Krol, Peter-Paul van der Toorn, Hanja de Jager, Wilma Heemsbergen, Ben Heijmen, Floris Pos

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.