Current and future treatment options for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: Focus on nasal polyposis - 04/12/15
Abstract |
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects more than 10% of the population in the United States and Europe. Recent findings point to a considerable variation of inflammatory subtypes in patients with CRS with nasal polyps and patients with CRS without nasal polyps. According to current guidelines, glucocorticosteroids and antibiotics are the principle pharmacotherapeutic approaches; however, they fail in a group of patients who share common clinical and laboratory markers. Several clinical phenotypes often leading to uncontrolled disease, including adult nasal polyposis, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, are characterized by a common endotype: a TH2 bias is associated with a higher likelihood of comorbid asthma and recurrence after surgical treatment. As a consequence, several innovative approaches targeting the TH2 bias with humanized mAbs have been subjected to proof-of-concept studies in patients with CRS with nasal polyps with or without comorbid asthma: omalizumab, reslizumab, mepolizumab, and recently dupilumab. Future concepts using upstream targets, such as GATA-3, also focus on this endotype. This current development might result in advantages in the treatment of patients with the most severe CRS.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Key words : Chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, TH2, IL-5, IL-4, IL-13, GATA-3, IgE, humanized and fully human mAbs, gene silencing
Abbreviations used : AERD, AFRS, CRS, CRSsNP, CRSwNP, CT, ESS, GCS, hmAb
Esquema
Series editors: Donald Y. M. Leung, MD, PhD, and Dennis K. Ledford, MD |
Vol 136 - N° 6
P. 1431-1440 - décembre 2015 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?