Normative Irritability in Youth: Developmental Findings From the Great Smoky Mountains Study - 24/07/15
Abstract |
Objective |
The goal of this study is to examine the developmental epidemiology of normative irritability and its tonic and phasic components in a longitudinal community sample of youth.
Method |
Eight waves of data from the prospective, community Great Smoky Mountains Study (6,674 assessments of 1,420 participants) were used, covering children in the community 9 to 16 years of age. Youth and 1 parent were interviewed using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment to assess tonic (touchy/easily annoyed, irritable mood, angry or resentful) and phasic (temper tantrums or anger outbursts) components of irritability, including frequency, duration, onset, and cross-context variability.
Results |
At any given point in childhood/adolescence, 51.4% (standard error [SE] = 1.4) of participants reported phasic irritability, 28.3% (SE = 1.2) reported tonic irritability, and 22.8% (SE = 1.1) reported both. These prevalence levels decreased with age but did not vary by sex. The overlap between tonic and phasic irritability was high (odds ratio = 5.8, 95% CI = 3.3–10.5, p < .0001), with little evidence of tonic occurring without phasic irritability. Both tonic and phasic irritability predicted one another over time, supporting both heterotypic and homotypic continuity. Low levels of either tonic or phasic irritability increased risk for disrupted functioning including service use, school suspensions, parental burden, and emotional symptoms both concurrently and at 1-year follow-up.
Conclusion |
Irritability is relatively common, decreases with age but does not vary by sex, and at almost any level is associated with increased risk of disrupted functioning. Its relative components frequently overlap, although irritable outbursts are more common than irritable mood. Irritability appears to be a high-priority transdiagnostic marker for screening children in need of clinical attention.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key Words : childhood, irritability, epidemiology, development, longitudinal
Plan
An interview with the author is available by podcast at www.jaacap.org or by scanning the QR code to the right. |
|
The work presented here was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH63970, MH63671, MH48085, MH094605), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA/MH11301), NARSAD (Early Career Award to W.E.C.), and the William T. Grant Foundation. |
|
Disclosure: Dr. Copeland has received research support from the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression. Dr. Brotman has received research support from the National Institute of Mental Health. Dr. Costello has received research support from the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute on Drug Abuse. She was co-recipient of the 2009 National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Ruane Prize for Outstanding Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Research. She is co-author of the following assessment tools: Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA), Young Adult Psychiatric Assessment (YAPA), Child and Adolescent Impact Assessment (CAIA), Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA), and Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ). No personal income is derived from any of these measures. |
Vol 54 - N° 8
P. 635-642 - août 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?