Self-care Barriers Reported by Emergency Department Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Sociotechnical Systems-Based Approach - 20/06/15
Abstract |
Study objective |
We pilot tested a sociotechnical systems-based instrument that assesses the prevalence and nature of self-care barriers among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute heart failure.
Methods |
A semistructured instrument for measuring self-reported self-care barriers was developed and administered by ED clinicians and nonclinician researchers to 31 ED patients receiving a diagnosis of acute heart failure. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Feasibility was assessed by examining participant cooperation rates, instrument completion times, item nonresponse, and data yield.
Results |
Of 47 distinct self-care barriers assessed, a median of 15 per patient were indicated as “sometimes” or “often” present. Thirty-four specific barriers were reported by more than 25% of patients and 9 were reported by more than 50%. The sources of barriers included the person, self-care tasks, tools and technologies, and organizational, social, and physical contexts. Seven of the top 10 most prevalent barriers were related to patient characteristics; the next 3, to the organizational context (eg, life disruptions). A preliminary feasibility assessment found few item nonresponses or comprehension difficulties, good cooperation, and high data yield from both closed- and open-ended items, but also found opportunities to reduce median administration time and variability.
Conclusion |
An instrument assessing self-care barriers from multiple system sources can be feasibly implemented in the ED. Further research is required to modify the instrument for widespread use and evaluate its implementation across institutions and cultural contexts. Self-care barriers measurement can be one component of broader inquiry into the distributed health-related “work” activity of patients, caregivers, and clinicians.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Please see page 2 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
Supervising editor: Daniel A. Handel, MD, MBA |
|
Author contributions: RJH, CCS, ABS, and SPC conceived and designed the study. RJH obtained research funding, developed and reviewed the analysis, and drafted the article. All authors collected data and contributed to the article. CCS and SPC conducted and reported on parts of the analysis. KFM and SPC supervised enrollment and data collection activities. RJH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This study and Dr. Holden were sponsored by grants from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (K01AG044439) and grants UL1 TR000445 and KL2 TR000446 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) through the Vanderbilt Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). Dr. Storrow received grant support from NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K12HL109019) and NCATS (UL1TR000445). |
|
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. |
|
A XMJZ9TK survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 66 - N° 1
P. 1 - juillet 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?