S'abonner

Self-care Barriers Reported by Emergency Department Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Sociotechnical Systems-Based Approach - 20/06/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.12.031 
Richard J. Holden, PhD a, , Christiane C. Schubert, PhD b, Eugene C. Eiland, MD c, Alan B. Storrow, MD c, Karen F. Miller, RN, MPA c, Sean P. Collins, MD, MSc c
a Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing, and the Center for Health Informatics Research and Innovation, Indianapolis, IN 
b Department of Medical Education, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 
c Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 

Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

We pilot tested a sociotechnical systems-based instrument that assesses the prevalence and nature of self-care barriers among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute heart failure.

Methods

A semistructured instrument for measuring self-reported self-care barriers was developed and administered by ED clinicians and nonclinician researchers to 31 ED patients receiving a diagnosis of acute heart failure. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Feasibility was assessed by examining participant cooperation rates, instrument completion times, item nonresponse, and data yield.

Results

Of 47 distinct self-care barriers assessed, a median of 15 per patient were indicated as “sometimes” or “often” present. Thirty-four specific barriers were reported by more than 25% of patients and 9 were reported by more than 50%. The sources of barriers included the person, self-care tasks, tools and technologies, and organizational, social, and physical contexts. Seven of the top 10 most prevalent barriers were related to patient characteristics; the next 3, to the organizational context (eg, life disruptions). A preliminary feasibility assessment found few item nonresponses or comprehension difficulties, good cooperation, and high data yield from both closed- and open-ended items, but also found opportunities to reduce median administration time and variability.

Conclusion

An instrument assessing self-care barriers from multiple system sources can be feasibly implemented in the ED. Further research is required to modify the instrument for widespread use and evaluate its implementation across institutions and cultural contexts. Self-care barriers measurement can be one component of broader inquiry into the distributed health-related “work” activity of patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 2 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Daniel A. Handel, MD, MBA
 Author contributions: RJH, CCS, ABS, and SPC conceived and designed the study. RJH obtained research funding, developed and reviewed the analysis, and drafted the article. All authors collected data and contributed to the article. CCS and SPC conducted and reported on parts of the analysis. KFM and SPC supervised enrollment and data collection activities. RJH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This study and Dr. Holden were sponsored by grants from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (K01AG044439) and grants UL1 TR000445 and KL2 TR000446 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) through the Vanderbilt Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). Dr. Storrow received grant support from NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K12HL109019) and NCATS (UL1TR000445).
 The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
 A XMJZ9TK survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2015  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 66 - N° 1

P. 1 - juillet 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Information for Readers
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Quantifying Patient-Physician Communication and Perceptions of Risk During Admissions for Possible Acute Coronary Syndromes
  • David H. Newman, Brian Ackerman, Matthew L. Kraushar, Margo H. Lederhandler, Amal Masri, Anna Starikov, Daisy T. Tsao, H. Pendell Meyers, Kaushal H. Shah

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.