S'abonner

Impact of smoking on perioperative outcomes after major surgery - 18/06/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.045 
Marianne Schmid, M.D. a, b, , 1 , Akshay Sood, M.D. c, 1, Logan Campbell, M.D. c, Victor Kapoor, M.D. c, Deepansh Dalela, M.D. c, Dane E. Klett, M.D. c, Felix K.-H. Chun, M.D. b, Adam S. Kibel, M.D. a, Jesse D. Sammon, D.O. c, Mani Menon, M.D. c, Margit Fisch, M.D. b, Quoc-Dien Trinh, M.D. a
a Center for Surgery and Public Health and Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA 
b Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany 
c Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, USA 

Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-617-732-6325; fax: +1-617-566-3475.

Abstract

Background

To investigate the impact of smoking on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing one of the 16 major cardiovascular, orthopedic, or oncologic surgical procedures.

Methods

We relied on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005 to 2011). Procedure-specific multivariable logistic regression models assessed the association between smoking status (non, former, or current smokers) and risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality.

Results

Overall, 141,802 patients were identified. A total of 12.5%, 14.6%, and 14.9% of non, former, and current smokers, respectively, experienced at least one complication (P < .001). In multivariable models, current smokers had higher odds of overall, pulmonary, wound, and septic/shock complications following most cardiovascular and oncologic surgeries compared with nonsmokers. The odds of experiencing such adverse outcomes were significantly lower in former smokers compared with current smokers, but still higher compared with nonsmokers.

Conclusions

The effect of smoking on perioperative outcomes is procedure dependent. Current and, even though mitigated, former smoking negatively influence outcomes following cardiovascular or oncologic procedures. Patients undergoing major procedures should be encouraged to discontinue tobacco smoking to achieve optimal procedural outcomes.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

The impact of smoking on perioperative outcomes is procedure dependent.
Current smoking especially negatively influences outcomes following cardiovascular or oncologic procedures.
Former smokers had less adverse outcomes compared with current smokers, but still more compared with nonsmokers.
Patients undergoing major procedures should be encouraged to discontinue tobacco smoking to achieve optimal procedural outcomes.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Smoking, Surgery, Cardiovascular, Oncologic, Orthopedic, Perioperative outcomes


Plan


 The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 Author contributions: All authors have directly participated in the planning, execution, or analysis of the study. In addition, they have read and approved the final version submitted. The contents of this manuscript have not been copyrighted or published previously and are not now under consideration for publication elsewhere. They will not be copyrighted, submitted, or published elsewhere while acceptance by The American Journal of Surgery is under consideration. There are no directly related manuscripts or abstracts, published or unpublished, by any authors of this article. If accepted, it will not be published elsewhere including electronically in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the copyright holder.


© 2015  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 210 - N° 2

P. 221 - août 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Identifying quality markers and improvement measures for ward-based surgical care: a semistructured interview study
  • Philip H. Pucher, Rajesh Aggarwal, Pritam Singh, Muaaz Tahir, Ara Darzi
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy of large pheochromocytoma: a prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study
  • Weigang Wang, Ping Li, Yishu Wang, Yuantao Wang, Zhiyong Ma, Gang Wang, Jialin Gao, Honglan Zhou

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.