S'abonner

Accuracy of lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of consolidations when compared to chest computed tomography - 09/05/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.01.035 
Peiman Nazerian, MD a, , Giovanni Volpicelli, MD, FCCP b, Simone Vanni, MD, PhD a, Chiara Gigli, MD a, Laura Betti, MD a, Maurizio Bartolucci, MD c, Maurizio Zanobetti, MD a, Francesca Romana Ermini, MD a, Cristina Iannello, MD b, Stefano Grifoni, MD a
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Torino, Italy 
c Radiology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Firenze, Italy. Tel.: +39 3396122448, +39 0557947322; fax: +39 0557947147.

Abstract

Objectives

Despite emerging evidences on the clinical usefulness of lung ultrasound (LUS), international guidelines still do not recommend the use of sonography for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Our study assesses the accuracy of LUS for the diagnosis of lung consolidations when compared to chest computed tomography (CT).

Methods

This was a prospective study on an emergency department population complaining of respiratory symptoms of unexplained origin. All patients who had a chest CT scan performed for clinical reasons were consecutively recruited. LUS was targeted to evaluate lung consolidations with the morphologic characteristics of pneumonia, and then compared to CT.

Results

We analyzed 285 patients. CT was positive for at least one consolidation in 87 patients. LUS was feasible in all patients and in 81 showed at least one consolidation, with a good inter-observer agreement (k = 0.83), sensitivity 82.8% (95% CI 73.2%-90%) and specificity 95.5% (95% CI 91.5%-97.9%). Sensitivity raised to 91.7% (95% CI 61.5%-98.6%) and specificity to 97.4% (95% CI 86.5%-99.6%) in patients complaining of pleuritic chest pain. In a subgroup of 190 patients who underwent also chest radiography (CXR), the sensitivity of LUS (81.4%, 95% CI 70.7%-89.7%) was significantly superior to CXR (64.3%, 95% CI 51.9%-75.4%) (P<.05), whereas specificity remained similar (94.2%, 95% CI 88.4%-97.6% vs. 90%, 95% CI 83.2%-94.7%).

Conclusions

LUS represents a reliable diagnostic tool, alternative to CXR, for the bedside diagnosis of lung consolidations in patients with respiratory complains.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Author contributions: Dr. Nazerian is the guarantor of the manuscript.
Dr Nazerian: contributed to study conception and design and data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafted the manuscript, edit the manuscript for important intellectual and scientific content; served as the principal author; edited the revision; and approved the final draft.
Dr Volpicelli: contributed to study design, drafted and edited for important intellectual and scientific content, edit the revision and approved the final draft.
Dr Vanni: contributed to study conception and design, conduct statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript, edited the revision and approved the final draft.
Dr Betti: contributed to data acquisition, conducted statistical analysis, edited the revision and approved the final draft.
Dr Gigli: contributed to data acquisition, conducted statistical analysis, edited the revision, and approved the final draft.
Dr Bartolucci: contributed to data acquisition, and approved the final draft.
Dr Zanobetti: contributed to data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafted and edited for important intellectual and scientific content and approved the final draft.
Dr. Ermini: contributed to data acquisition, edited the revision, and approved the final draft.
Dr. Iannello: edited the revision and approved the final draft.
Dr Grifoni: contributed to data analysis and interpretation and approved the final draft.
☆☆ All the authors have participated in the preparation of and read and approved the final manuscript.
 Funding Sources: none.
★★ Disclosures: the authors have no potential conflict of interest to disclose
The article has never been presented.


© 2015  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 33 - N° 5

P. 620-625 - mai 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Are there high-risk groups among physicians that are more vulnerable to on-call work?
  • Tarja Heponiemi, Anna-Mari Aalto, Laura Pekkarinen, Eeva Siuvatti, Marko Elovainio
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Vomiting is not associated with poor outcomes in pediatric victims of unintentional submersions
  • Kimberley M. Farr, Elizabeth A. Camp, Shabana Yusuf, Rohit P. Shenoi

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.