S'abonner

The Influence of Angle of Insonation and Target Depth on Speckle-Tracking Strain - 04/05/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.echo.2014.12.015 
Daniel Forsha, MD a, Niels Risum, MD b, Sudarshan Rajagopal, MD c, Stephen Dolgner, MD d, Christoph Hornik, MD e, Huiman Barnhart, PhD e, Joseph Kisslo, MD c, Piers Barker, MD f,
a Ward Family Heart Center, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri 
b Department of Cardiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark 
c Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 
d Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 
e Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 
f Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 

Reprint requests: Piers Barker, MD, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3090, Durham, NC 27710.

Abstract

Background

Speckle-tracking strain is almost universally cited as being independent of angle of insonation, but there are minimal confirmatory studies, and this claim may not be consistent with the known limitations of ultrasound axial and lateral spatial resolution. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of angle and depth on longitudinal peak systolic strain (LPS).

Methods

Thirty-four healthy pediatric subjects (age range, 6–18 years; 47% male) with normal cardiac anatomy and good image quality were prospectively imaged. Angular comparisons of LPS were investigated by examining interangle reproducibility on the basis of one standard and one alternative image acquisition relative to intraobserver reproducibility of two standard views of the same left ventricular segments. A single-window comparison was used to evaluated septal LPS: standard apical four-chamber versus right ventricular centered four-chamber. Two paired standard and alternative window comparisons were as follows: (1) four-chamber: standard apical versus subcostal; and (2) three-chamber: standard apical versus parasternal long-axis.

Results

The global LPS intraobserver difference using the paired standard and alternative window comparisons was lower than the interangle difference in global LPS (−1.0 ± 0.1% vs −2.1 ± 2.4%). Intraobserver reproducibility was significantly higher than interangle reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.9 vs 0.29, P < .001). Similar results were found in the segmental strain analysis. Interangle reproducibility was significantly decreased compared with intraobserver reproducibility in the septal single-window comparison. Target depth assessment demonstrated a systematic bias between the near-field and far-field segments.

Conclusions

Echocardiographically derived LPS values were modestly dependent on angle of insonation and target depth in this pediatric population. Normal strain ranges derived from standard apical images should not be applied to strain derived from sub-costal images, off-axis apical imaging, or applications in which a standard window cannot be defined.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Speckle-tracking strain, Echocardiography, Angle dependence, Test characteristics, Depth dependence

Abbreviations : ICC, LPS, LV, LV4, PLAX3, PSAW, RV4, SC4, STE


Plan


 Dr Kisslo is a member of the speakers’ bureau of Philips. Drs Forsha, Barker, and Kisslo receive research grant support from Medtronic.


© 2015  American Society of Echocardiography. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 28 - N° 5

P. 580-586 - mai 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Echocardiographic Measurements in Normal Chinese Adults Focusing on Cardiac Chambers and Great Arteries: A Prospective, Nationwide, and Multicenter Study
  • Gui-Hua Yao, Yan Deng, Yan Liu, Ming-Jun Xu, Cheng Zhang, You-Bin Deng, Wei-Dong Ren, Zhi-An Li, Hong Tang, Quan-Bin Zhang, Yu-Ming Mu, Li-Gang Fang, Mei Zhang, Li-Xue Yin, Yun Zhang, Echocardiographic Measurements in Normal Chinese Adults (EMINCA) Study Investigators
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Global Longitudinal Strain and Global Circumferential Strain by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and Feature-Tracking Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
  • Toshinari Onishi, Samir K. Saha, Antonia Delgado-Montero, Daniel R. Ludwig, Tetsuari Onishi, Erik B. Schelbert, David Schwartzman, John Gorcsan

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.