S'abonner

Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial - 31/03/15

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8 
Jeffrey S Weber, DrMD a, , Sandra P D’Angelo, MD b, David Minor, MD c, F Stephen Hodi, MD d, Ralf Gutzmer, MD e, Bart Neyns, MD f, Christoph Hoeller, MD g, Nikhil I Khushalani, MD h, Wilson H Miller, MD i, Christopher D Lao, MD j, Gerald P Linette, MD k, Luc Thomas, MD l, Paul Lorigan, FRCP m, Kenneth F Grossmann, MD n, Jessica C Hassel, MD o, Michele Maio, MD p, Mario Sznol, MD q, Paolo A Ascierto, MD r, Peter Mohr, MD s, Bartosz Chmielowski, MD t, Alan Bryce, MD u, Inge M Svane, MD v, Jean-Jacques Grob, MD w, Angela M Krackhardt, MD x, Christine Horak, PhD y, Alexandre Lambert, PhD z, Arvin S Yang, MD y, James Larkin, FRCP aa
a Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA 
b Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA 
c California Pacific Center for Melanoma Research, San Francisco, CA, USA 
d Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA 
e Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany 
f Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium 
g Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 
h Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA 
i Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada 
j University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 
k Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA 
l Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Lyon, France 
m Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK 
n Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 
o German Cancer Research Centre University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany 
p Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Siena, Italy 
q Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA 
r Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy 
s Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany 
t Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 
u Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA 
v Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark 
w Aix-Marseille University, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France 
x Technische Universität München School of Medicine, II Medical Department, Munich, Germany 
y Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA 
z Bristol-Myers Squibb, Braine-I’Alleud, Belgium 
aa Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK 

* Correspondence to: Dr Jeffrey S Weber, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA

Summary

Background

Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, can result in durable responses in patients with melanoma who have progressed after ipilimumab and BRAF inhibitors. We assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab compared with investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) as a second-line or later-line treatment in patients with advanced melanoma.

Methods

In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients at 90 sites in 14 countries. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had unresectable or metastatic melanoma, and progressed after ipilimumab, or ipilimumab and a BRAF inhibitor if they were BRAFV 600 mutation-positive. Participating investigators randomly assigned (with an interactive voice response system) patients 2:1 to receive an intravenous infusion of nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or ICC (dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 combined with carboplatin area under the curve 6 every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. We stratified randomisation by BRAF mutation status, tumour expression of PD-L1, and previous best overall response to ipilimumab. We used permuted blocks (block size of six) within each stratum. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who had an objective response and overall survival. Treatment was given open-label, but those doing tumour assessments were masked to treatment assignment. We assessed objective responses per-protocol after 120 patients had been treated with nivolumab and had a minimum follow-up of 24 weeks, and safety in all patients who had had at least one dose of treatment. The trial is closed and this is the first interim analysis, reporting the objective response primary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01721746.

Findings

Between Dec 21, 2012, and Jan 10, 2014, we screened 631 patients, randomly allocating 272 patients to nivolumab and 133 to ICC. Confirmed objective responses were reported in 38 (31·7%, 95% CI 23·5–40·8) of the first 120 patients in the nivolumab group versus five (10·6%, 3·5–23·1) of 47 patients in the ICC group. Grade 3–4 adverse events related to nivolumab included increased lipase (three [1%] of 268 patients), increased alanine aminotransferase, anaemia, and fatigue (two [1%] each); for ICC, these included neutropenia (14 [14%] of 102), thrombocytopenia (six [6%]), and anaemia (five [5%]). We noted grade 3–4 drug-related serious adverse events in 12 (5%) nivolumab-treated patients and nine (9%) patients in the ICC group. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Interpretation

Nivolumab led to a greater proportion of patients achieving an objective response and fewer toxic effects than with alternative available chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced melanoma that has progressed after ipilimumab or ipilimumab and a BRAF inhibitor. Nivolumab represents a new treatment option with clinically meaningful durable objective responses in a population of high unmet need.

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2015  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 16 - N° 4

P. 375-384 - avril 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Late Fragments
  • Isabel Lokody
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial
  • Hyoung Jin Kang, Susan Loftus, Arlene Taylor, Cara DiCristina, Stuart Green, Christian Michel Zwaan

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.