A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Circumcision With Shang Ring vs Conventional Circumcision - 28/03/15
Abstract |
Herein, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence to compare the safety and efficacy of Shang Ring circumcision (SRC) with conventional circumcision (CC) for male patients. Articles were searched by 2 independent reviewers. Overall, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 3314 patients were included. Compared with the CC group, SRC is associated with shorter operative time, lower intraoperative pain score, higher satisfaction with penile appearances, less intraoperative blood loss, lower adverse event rate, and lower wound bleeding rate. SRC appears to be a safer and more effective choice in comparison with CC for male patients.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Dehong Cao, Liangren Liu, and Yingchun Hu contributed equally to this work and share first authorship. |
|
| Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests. |
|
| Funding Support: The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (grant numbers 81200551, 81270841, and 81300627). |
|
| No funding bodies played any role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or in the preparation of this article. |
Vol 85 - N° 4
P. 799-804 - avril 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Radical Cystectomy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancer in the Elderly: A Population-based Study
- Michael J. Leveridge, D. Robert Siemens, William J. Mackillop, Yingwei Peng, Ian F. Tannock, David M. Berman, Christopher M. Booth
- Ropporin Gene Expression in Infertile Asthenozoospermic Men With Varicocele Before and After Repair
- Medhat K. Amer, Rashad M. Mostafa, Amal Fathy, Hany M. Saad, Taymour Mostafa
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?