Predictors of the necessity for early tracheostomy in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury: a 15-year experience - 13/02/15
Abstract |
Background |
The need for mechanical ventilation (MV) after spinal cord injury (SCI) is a risk factor for prolonged critical care. The “purpose” of this study was to identify the level of cervical SCI that requires MV, thereby defining candidates for tracheostomy.
Methods |
Patients with cervical SCI over a 15-year period were reviewed.
Results |
One hundred sixty-three patients sustained cervical SCI. Of 76 complete injuries, 91% required MV for greater than 48 hours. By injury level, MV incidence was 100% for C2–4, 91% for C5, 79% for C6, and 80% for C7. Only one quarter of patients with incomplete SCI required MV for greater than 48 hours; Glascow Coma Score and Injury Severity Score were significantly worse compared with patients not requiring MV.
Conclusions |
Factors influencing the decision for tracheostomy in cervical SCI patients include the presence of a complete SCI, anatomic level of injury, Glascow Coma Score, Injury Severity Score, and associated thoracic injury. Patients with complete cervical SCI often require prolonged MV. Conversely, the minority of incomplete SCI required MV; the need for tracheostomy was likely performed for associated injuries. Utilizing identified factors permits a thoughtful approach to tracheostomy in this patient population.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Cervical spine, Spinal cord injury, Tracheostomy, Prolonged ventilation, Trauma
Plan
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
Vol 209 - N° 2
P. 363-368 - février 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?