External fixation of distal femoral fractures in adults’ multicentre retrospective study of 43 patients - 06/12/14
the
SoFCOTf
Abstract |
Background |
A multicenter cohort of 43 adults with distal femoral fractures (DFFs) managed with external fixation was evaluated to determine the potential of this treatment.
Patients and methods |
The patients were young adults (mean age: 39.6 years) with high-energy trauma; 12 had polytrauma and 41 multiple fractures. Most patients (38/43) had compound DFFs. Fracture types were A in 3 patients, B in 3 patients, and C in 37 patients. A tibio-femoral construct was required in 11 patients and a femoro-femoral construct in 32 patients.
Results |
The normal femoral axis was restored within 5° in the coronal plane in 34 (79%) patients and in the sagittal plane in 22 (51%) patients. Axis restoration within 5° in both planes was achieved in 19 (44.7%) patients. After femoro-femoral external fixation, mean malalignment was 4.2° in the coronal plane and 8.6° in the sagittal plane; corresponding values after tibio-femoral external fixation were 1.3° and 8.6°. In 23 patients (of whom 1 was lost to follow-up), external fixation was intended as the only and definitive treatment; among them, 1 required amputation after a failed revascularization procedure, 10 achieved fracture healing within a mean of 21.2 weeks, 6 required conversion to another technique, and 5 underwent non-conservative procedures (total knee arthroplasty in 3 and arthrodesis in 2). In the remaining 20 patients, conversion to internal fixation was intended initially and performed within a mean of 4.7 weeks; 1 of these patients required amputation for ischemia, 3 did not achieve fracture healing, 12 achieved primary fracture healing, and 4 achieved fracture healing after repeated grafting (n=3) or osteotomy (n=1). At last follow-up (at least 1 year), the mean International Knee Society (IKS) Function Score was 67.3 and an IKS Knee Score of 68.5. Range of active flexion was 85.75° overall, 62.3° in the group with intended definitive external fixation and 101° in the group with intended conversion to internal fixation. Healing without complications was achieved in 10 (43%) in the former group and 12 (60%) in the latter group.
Conclusion |
Our data support provisional external fixation followed by early conversion to internal fixation in patients with extensively compounded DFFs; patients with multiple fractures requiring several surgical procedures; and polytrauma patients awaiting hemodynamic, respiratory, or neurological stabilization.
Level of evidence |
IV, retrospective study.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : External fixator, Open femoral fracture, Distal femoral fracture
Plan
Vol 100 - N° 8
P. 867-872 - décembre 2014 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.