Electromagnetic interference caused by common surgical energy-based devices on an implanted cardiac defibrillator - 02/12/14
Abstract |
Background |
Surgical energy-based devices emit energy, which can interfere with other electronic devices (eg, implanted cardiac pacemakers and/or defibrillators). The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of unintentional energy (electromagnetic interference [EMI]) transferred to an implanted cardiac defibrillator by common surgical energy-based devices.
Methods |
A transvenous cardiac defibrillator was implanted in an anesthetized pig. The primary outcome measure was the average maximum EMI occurring on the implanted cardiac device during activations of multiple different surgical energy-based devices.
Results |
The EMI transferred to the implanted cardiac device is as follows: traditional bipolar 30 W .01 ± .004 mV, advanced bipolar .004 ± .003 mV, ultrasonic shears .01 ± .004 mV, monopolar Bovie 30 W coagulation .50 ± .20 mV, monopolar Bovie 30 W blend .92 ± .63 mV, monopolar instrument without dispersive electrode .21 ± .07 mV, plasma energy 3.48 ± .78 mV, and argon beam coagulator 2.58 ± .34 mV.
Conclusion |
Surgeons can minimize EMI on implanted cardiac defibrillators by preferentially utilizing bipolar and ultrasonic devices.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Surgical energy-based device, Electrosurgery, Defibrillator, Electromagnetic interference
Plan
The authors have the following conflicts of interest to disclose: G.G. is an employee of Medtronic; J.E.D. is an employee of Covidien; and T.N.R. received research grants from Medtronics, Covidien, and Karl Storz. |
Vol 208 - N° 6
P. 932-936 - décembre 2014 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?