S'abonner

Changes in bone mineral density at 3 years in postmenopausal women receiving anastrozole and risedronate in the IBIS-II bone substudy: an international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial - 25/11/14

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71035-6 
Ivana Sestak, DrPhD a, , Shalini Singh, PhD a, Jack Cuzick, ProfPhD a, Glen M Blake, ProfPhD b, Rajesh Patel, PhD c, Fatma Gossiel, MSc d, Rob Coleman, ProfMD e, Mitch Dowsett, ProfPhD f, John F Forbes, ProfMD g, Anthony Howell, ProfMD h, Richard Eastell, ProfPhD d
a Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, UK 
b Biomedical Engineering Department, King’s College London, London, UK 
c Imperial College London, London, UK 
d Department of Human Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK 
e Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK 
f Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK 
g University of Newcastle, Calvary Mater Hospital, Australia New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia 
h Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, Manchester, UK 

* Correspondence to: Dr Ivana Sestak, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK

Summary

Background

Aromatase inhibitors prevent breast cancer in postmenopausal women at high risk of the disease but are associated with accelerated bone loss. We assessed effectiveness of oral risedronate for prevention of reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) after 3 years of follow-up in a subset of patients in the IBIS-II trial.

Methods

The double-blind IBIS-II trial recruited 3864 healthy, postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer and randomly allocated them oral anastrozole (1 mg/day) or matched placebo. 1410 (36%) postmenopausal women were then enrolled in a bone substudy and stratified at baseline according to their lowest baseline T score at spine or femoral neck (stratum I: T score at least −1·0; stratum II: T score at least −2·5 but less than −1·0; stratum III: T score less than −2·5 but greater than −4·0). Women in stratum I were monitored only; women in stratum III were all given risedronate (35 mg/week). Women in stratum II were randomly assigned (1:1) to risedronate (35 mg/week) or matched placebo by use of a block randomisation schedule via a web-based programme. The primary outcome of this per-protocol analysis (done with all women with a baseline and 3 year DXA assessment) was the effect of risedronate versus placebo for osteopenic women in stratum II randomly allocated to anastrozole (1 mg/day). Secondary outcomes included effect of anastrozole (1 mg/day) on BMD in women not receiving risedronate (strata I and II) and in osteoporotic women who were all treated with risedronate (stratum III). The trial is ongoing, but no longer recruiting. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN31488319.

Findings

Between Feb 2, 2003, and Sept 30, 2010, 150 (58%) of 260 women in stratum II who had been randomly allocated to anastrozole and either risedronate or placebo had baseline and 3 year assessments. At the lumbar spine, 3 year mean BMD change for the 77 women receiving anastrozole/risedronate was 1·1% (95% CI 0·2 to 2·1) versus −2·6% (−4·0 to −1·3) for the 73 women receiving anastrozole/placebo (p<0·0001). For the total hip, 3 year mean BMD change for women receiving anastrozole/risedronate was −0·7% (−1·6 to 0·2) versus −3·5% (−4·6 to −2·3) for women receiving anastrozole/placebo (p=0·0001). 652 (65%) of 1008 women in strata I and II who were not randomly allocated to risedronate had both baseline and 3 year assessments. Women not receiving risedronate in stratum I and II who received anastrozole (310 women) had a significant BMD decrease after 3 years of follow-up compared with women who received placebo (342 women) at the lumbar spine (−4·0% [–4·5 to −3·4] vs −1·2% [−1·7 to −0·7], p<0·0001) and total hip (−4·0% [–4·4 to −3·6] vs −1·8% [−2·1 to −1·4], p<0·0001). 106 (79%) of 149 women in stratum III had a baseline and a 3 year assessment. The 46 women allocated to anastrozole had a modest BMD increase of 1·2% (−0·1 to 2·6) at the spine compared with a 3·9% (2·6 to 5·2) increase for the 60 women allocated to placebo (p=0·006). For the total hip, a small 0·3% (−0·9 to 1·5) increase was noted for women allocated anastrozole compared with a 1·5% (0·5 to 2·5) increase for women allocated placebo, but the difference was not significant (p=0·12). The most common adverse event reported was arthralgia (stratum I: 94 placebo and 114 anastrozole; stratum II: 39 placebo/placebo, 25 placebo/risedronate, 34 anastrozole/placebo, and 34 anastrozole/risedronate; stratum III: 21 placebo/risedronate, 17 anastrozole/risedronate). Other adverse events included hot flushes, alopecia, abdominal pain, and back pain.

Interpretation

Risedronate counterbalances the effect of anastrozole-induced bone loss in osteopenic and osteoporotic women and might be offered in combination with anastrozole treatment to provide an improved risk–benefit profile.

Funding

Cancer Research UK (C569/A5032), National Health and Medical Research Council Australia (GNT300755, GNT569213), Sanofi-Aventis, and AstraZeneca.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2014  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 15 - N° 13

P. 1460-1468 - décembre 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Addition of interleukin-6 inhibition with tocilizumab to standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: a phase 1/2 trial
  • Glen A Kennedy, Antiopi Varelias, Slavica Vuckovic, Laetitia Le Texier, Kate H Gartlan, Ping Zhang, Gethin Thomas, Lisa Anderson, Glen Boyle, Nicole Cloonan, Justine Leach, Elise Sturgeon, Judy Avery, Stuart D Olver, Mary Lor, Ashish K Misra, Cheryl Hutchins, A James Morton, Simon TS Durrant, Elango Subramoniapillai, Jason P Butler, Cameron I Curley, Kelli P A MacDonald, Siok-Keen Tey, Geoffrey R Hill
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • RNA biomarkers associated with metastatic progression in prostate cancer: a multi-institutional high-throughput analysis of SChLAP1
  • John R Prensner, Shuang Zhao, Nicholas Erho, Matthew Schipper, Matthew K Iyer, Saravana M Dhanasekaran, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Rohit Mehra, Anirban Sahu, Javed Siddiqui, Elai Davicioni, Robert B Den, Adam P Dicker, R Jeffrey Karnes, John T Wei, Eric A Klein, Robert B Jenkins, Arul M Chinnaiyan, Felix Y Feng

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.