Noninvasive Inhaled Nitric Oxide Does Not Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Premature Newborns - 21/11/14
Abstract |
Objective |
To assess the efficacy and safety of early, noninvasive inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy in premature newborns who do not require mechanical ventilation.
Study design |
We performed a multicenter randomized trial including 124 premature newborns who required noninvasive supplemental oxygen within the first 72 hours after birth. Newborns were stratified into 3 different groups by birth weight (500-749, 750-999, 1000-1250 g) prior to randomization to iNO (10 ppm) or placebo gas (controls) until 30 weeks postmenstrual age. The primary outcome was a composite of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Secondary outcomes included the need for and duration of mechanical ventilation, severity of BPD, and safety outcomes.
Results |
There was no difference in the incidence of death or BPD in the iNO and placebo groups (42% vs 40%, P = .86, relative risk = 1.06, 0.7-1.6). BPD severity was not different between the treatment groups. There were no differences between the groups in the need for mechanical ventilation (22% vs 23%; P = .89), duration of mechanical ventilation (9.7 vs 8.4 days; P = .27), or safety outcomes including severe intracranial hemorrhage (3.4% vs 6.2%, P = .68).
Conclusions |
We found that iNO delivered noninvasively to premature infants who have not progressed to early respiratory failure is a safe treatment, but does not decrease the incidence or severity of BPD, reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, or alter the clinical course.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keyword : BPD, CPAP, iNO, NO, PH, PMA
Plan
Funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL084923) and the National Institutes of Health/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (Colorado CTSI grant Number UL1TR001082). INO Therapeutics Inc provided study gas and INOVent devices for this trial. The company remained masked to the results and was not involved in study design, data analysis or interpretation, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
|
Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00955487. |
Vol 165 - N° 6
P. 1104 - décembre 2014 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?