Associations Between Patient and Emergency Department Operational Characteristics and Patient Satisfaction Scores in an Adult Population - 20/11/14
Abstract |
Study objective |
Our primary aim is to identify patient and emergency department (ED) characteristics that are associated with patient satisfaction scores.
Methods |
This retrospective study reviewed Press Ganey patient satisfaction surveys completed between December 2009 and May 2013 in a single academic ED for all patients aged 21 years and older. Patient and ED operational characteristics were included in the analysis. The outcomes were satisfaction scores for overall experience, likelihood to recommend, and wait time before consulting provider. A linear mixed-effects regression model was used while taking the clustering within patients and physicians into account.
Results |
Two thousand eighty-three patients were included in the analysis, representing all responses to the survey. A total response rate could not be calculated because Press Ganey does not report the total number of surveys sent out. During this period, 119,244 patients were treated in the ED. The overall mean score was 7.7 (SD 2.7) for overall experience, 78.0 (SD 31.8) for likelihood to recommend, and 70.9 (SD 30.7) for wait time before consulting provider. For all 3 outcomes, white older patients with low door-to-room times had higher scores. Additionally, survey language and payer type were significantly associated with overall experience score, discharge length of stay and time of day by shift were significantly associated with wait time scores, and patients who arrive by ambulance were less likely to recommend the ED.
Conclusion |
Both ED and patient characteristics were associated with satisfaction with care. EDs seeking to increase patient satisfaction scores may consider working on reducing door-to-room times.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, PhD |
|
Author contributions: DAH conceived the concept of the study, drafted the initial article, and coordinated its revisions. All authors provided a critical review of the article and provided data for analysis. DAH and RF oversaw data analysis. DAH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. |
|
Please see page 605 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 64 - N° 6
P. 604-608 - décembre 2014 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?