S'abonner

Toward Better Use of Bone Scans Among Men With Early-stage Prostate Cancer - 26/09/14

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.010 
Selin Merdan a, Paul R. Womble b, c, David C. Miller b, c, Christine Barnett a, Zaojun Ye b, c, Susan M. Linsell c, James E. Montie b, c, Brian T. Denton a,
a Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 
b Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 
c Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI 

Reprint requests: Brian T. Denton, Ph.D., Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, 205 Beal Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the performance of published guidelines compared with that of current practice for radiographic staging of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

Using data from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative clinical registry, we identified 1509 men diagnosed with prostate cancer from March 2012 through June 2013. Clinical data included age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), clinical trial stage, number of biopsy cores, and bone scan (BS) results. We then fit a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the association between clinical variables and the occurrence of bone metastases. Because some patients did not undergo BS, we used established methods to correct for verification bias and estimate the diagnostic accuracy of published guidelines.

Results

Among 416 men who received a BS, 48 (11.5%) had evidence of bone metastases. Patients with bone metastases were older, with higher PSA levels and GS (all P <.05). In multivariate analyses, PSA (P <.001) and GS (P = .004) were the only independent predictors of positive BS. Guidelines from the American Urological Association and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network demonstrated similar performance in detecting bone metastases in our population, with fewer negative study results than those of the European Association of Urology guideline. Applying the American Urological Association recommendations (ie, image when PSA level >20 ng/mL or GS ≥8) to current clinical practice, we estimate that <1% of positive study results would be missed, whereas the number of negative study results would be reduced by 38%.

Conclusion

Based on current practice patterns, more uniform application of existing guidelines would ensure that BS is performed for almost all men with bone metastases, while avoiding many negative imaging studies.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Financial Disclosure: David C. Miller has contract support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for serving as Director of Michigan Urological Society Improvement Collaborative. He is a consultant for ArborMetrix and receives grant support from the National Cancer Institute (grant 1R01CA174768-01A1), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant K08 HS018346-01A1), and the Urology Care Foundation (Rising Star in Urology Research Award). James E. Montie receives salary support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation (through the University of Michigan) for serving as Co-Director of the Michigan Urological Society Improvement Collaborative. Brian T. Denton receives grant support from the National Science Foundation. The remaining authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.
 Funding Support: This material is also based in part on the work supported by the National Science Foundation under the grant number CMMI 0969885 (Brian T. Denton).
 Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


© 2014  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 84 - N° 4

P. 793-798 - octobre 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Is There an Association Between Polypropylene Midurethral Slings and Malignancy?
  • Ashley B. King, Anna Zampini, Sandip Vasavada, Courtenay Moore, Raymond R. Rackley, Howard B. Goldman
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Venous Thromboembolism After Major Urologic Oncology Surgery: A Focus on the Incidence and Timing of Thromboembolic Events After 27,455 Operations
  • Blake D. Alberts, Solomon L. Woldu, Aaron C. Weinberg, Matthew R. Danzig, Ruslan Korets, Ketan K. Badani

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.