S'abonner

Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial - 01/04/14

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70040-3 
David P Dearnaley, ProfFRCR a, b, Gordana Jovic, PhD c, Isabel Syndikus, FRCR d, Vincent Khoo, FRCR b, Richard A Cowan, FRCR e, John D Graham, FRCR f, Edwin G Aird, PhD g, David Bottomley, FRCR h, Robert A Huddart, FRCR a, b, Chakiath C Jose, FRANZCR i, John H L Matthews, FRANZCR i, Jeremy L Millar, FRANZCR j, Claire Murphy, BSc c, J Martin Russell, FRCR k, Christopher D Scrase, FRCR l, Mahesh K B Parmar, ProfDPhil c, Matthew R Sydes, MSc c,
a The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK 
b The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK 
c Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK 
d Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Wirral, UK 
e The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK 
f Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK 
g Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK 
h St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK 
i Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand 
j Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
k Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK 
l Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK 

* Correspondence to: Mr Matthew R Sydes, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London WC2B 6NH, UK

Summary

Background

The aim of this trial was to compare dose-escalated conformal radiotherapy with control-dose conformal radiotherapy in patients with localised prostate cancer. Preliminary findings reported after 5 years of follow-up showed that escalated-dose conformal radiotherapy improved biochemical progression-free survival. Based on the sample size calculation, we planned to analyse overall survival when 190 deaths occurred; this target has now been reached, after a median 10 years of follow-up.

Methods

RT01 was a phase 3, open-label, international, randomised controlled trial enrolling men with histologically confirmed T1b–T3a, N0, M0 prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen of less than 50 ng/mL. Patients were randomly assigned centrally in a 1:1 ratio, using a computer-based minimisation algorithm stratifying by risk of seminal vesicle invasion and centre to either the control group (64 Gy in 32 fractions, the standard dose at the time the trial was designed) or the escalated-dose group (74 Gy in 37 fractions). Neither patients nor investigators were masked to assignment. All patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for 3–6 months before the start of conformal radiotherapy, which continued until the end of conformal radiotherapy. The coprimary outcome measures were biochemical progression-free survival and overall survival. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. Treatment-related side-effects have been reported previously. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN47772397.

Findings

Between Jan 7, 1998, and Dec 20, 2001, 862 men were registered and 843 subsequently randomly assigned: 422 to the escalated-dose group and 421 to the control group. As of Aug 2, 2011, 236 deaths had occurred: 118 in each group. Median follow-up was 10·0 years (IQR 9·1–10·8). Overall survival at 10 years was 71% (95% CI 66–75) in each group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·99, 95% CI 0·77–1·28; p=0·96). Biochemical progression or progressive disease occurred in 391 patients (221 [57%] in the control group and 170 [43%] in the escalated-dose group). At 10 years, biochemical progression-free survival was 43% (95% CI 38–48) in the control group and 55% (50–61) in the escalated-dose group (HR 0·69, 95% CI 0·56–0·84; p=0·0003).

Interpretation

At a median follow-up of 10 years, escalated-dose conformal radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy showed an advantage in biochemical progression-free survival, but this advantage did not translate into an improvement in overall survival. These efficacy data for escalated-dose treatment must be weighed against the increase in acute and late toxicities associated with the escalated dose and emphasise the importance of use of appropriate modern radiotherapy methods to reduce side-effects.

Funding

UK Medical Research Council.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2014  Dearnaley et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 15 - N° 4

P. 464-473 - avril 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • 4 Gy versus 24 Gy radiotherapy for patients with indolent lymphoma (FORT): a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial
  • Peter J Hoskin, Amy A Kirkwood, Bilyana Popova, Paul Smith, Martin Robinson, Eve Gallop-Evans, Stewart Coltart, Timothy Illidge, Krishnaswamy Madhavan, Caroline Brammer, Patricia Diez, Andrew Jack, Isabel Syndikus
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Effects of adjuvant exemestane versus anastrozole on bone mineral density for women with early breast cancer (MA.27B): a companion analysis of a randomised controlled trial
  • Paul E Goss, Dawn L Hershman, Angela M Cheung, James N Ingle, Sundeep Khosla, Vered Stearns, Haji Chalchal, Kendrith Rowland, Hyman B Muss, Hannah M Linden, Judite Scher, Kathleen I Pritchard, Catherine R Elliott, Tanja Badovinac-Crnjevic, Jessica St Louis, Judith-Anne W Chapman, Lois E Shepherd

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.