Is unicompartmental-to-unicompartmental revision knee arthroplasty a reliable option? Case-control study - 04/02/14
, M. Leyder b, D. Saragaglia c, G. Pasquier d, G. Deschamps ethe Société Française de la Hanche et du Genou (SFHG)f
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Abstract |
Background |
In selected patients with failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), revision UKA is a reliable option and may even provide lower morbidity rates and better functional outcomes compared to revision total knee arthroplasty.
Material and methods |
In a multicentre retrospective study of 425 knees requiring revision surgery after UKA, 36 knees were managed with revision UKA.
Results |
Of the 36 knees, 3 (8.33%) required iterative revision surgery, for aseptic loosening. After a mean follow-up of 8.3 years, the mean IKS knee and function scores were high (93.81/100 and 90.77/100, respectively).
Discussion |
In carefully selected patients, UKA-to-UKA revision performed according to a rigorous operative technique deserves a role in the surgical strategy for failed UKA.
Level of evidence |
III, multicentre retrospective case-control study.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Knee arthroplasty, Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, Failure, Revision
Plan
Vol 100 - N° 1
P. 141-145 - février 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Mid-term outcomes after distally locked-to-standard primary stem exchange in 29 hip-prosthesis patients
- M.-L. Mencière, N. Wissocq, E. Krief, D. Elkoun, J. Taviaux, P. Mertl
- EOS analysis of lower extremity segmental torsion in children and young adults
- E. Gaumétou, S. Quijano, B. Ilharreborde, A. Presedo, P. Thoreux, K. Mazda, W. Skalli
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.