S'abonner

Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial - 28/01/14

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70586-2 
Martin Reck, DrMD a, b, , Rolf Kaiser, MD c, Anders Mellemgaard, MD e, Jean-Yves Douillard, ProfMD f, Sergey Orlov, ProfMD g, Maciej Krzakowski, ProfMD h, Joachim von Pawel, MD i, Maya Gottfried, MD j, Igor Bondarenko, ProfMD k, Meilin Liao, ProfMD l, Claudia-Nanette Gann, MD m, José Barrueco, PhD n, Birgit Gaschler-Markefski, PhD d, Silvia Novello, ProfMD o

for the LUME-Lung 1 Study Group

a Department of Thoracic Oncology, Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany 
b German Centre for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany 
c Corporate Division Medicine, TA Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Biberach an der Riss, Germany 
d Medical Data Services and Biostatistics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Biberach an der Riss, Germany 
e Department of Oncology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark 
f Department of Medical Oncology, Centre ICO René Gauducheau, Nantes, France 
g Department of Thoracic Oncology, St Petersburg State Medical University, St Petersburg, Russia 
h The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland 
i Pneumology Clinic, Asklepios Fachkliniken Munchen-Gauting, Gauting, Germany 
j Lung Cancer Unit, Meir Medical Centre, Kfar Saba, Israel 
k Clinical Facility, Dnepropetrovsk Medical Academy, Dnepropetrovsk Municipal Clinical Hospital no 4, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine 
l Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China 
m Department of Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Ingelheim, Germany 
n Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT, USA 
o Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AUO San Luigi, Orbassano, Italy 

* Correspondence to: Dr Martin Reck, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, 22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany

Summary

Background

The phase 3 LUME-Lung 1 study assessed the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus nintedanib as second-line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients from 211 centres in 27 countries with stage IIIB/IV recurrent NSCLC progressing after first-line chemotherapy, stratified by ECOG performance status, previous bevacizumab treatment, histology, and presence of brain metastases, were allocated (by computer-generated sequence through an interactive third-party system, in 1:1 ratio), to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion on day 1 plus either nintedanib 200 mg orally twice daily or matching placebo on days 2–21, every 3 weeks until unacceptable adverse events or disease progression. Investigators and patients were masked to assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent central review, analysed by intention to treat after 714 events in all patients. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat after 1121 events had occurred, in a prespecified stepwise order: first in patients with adenocarcinoma who progressed within 9 months after start of first-line therapy, then in all patients with adenocarcinoma, then in all patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00805194.

Findings

Between Dec 23, 2008, and Feb 9, 2011, 655 patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel plus nintedanib and 659 to receive docetaxel plus placebo. The primary analysis was done after a median follow-up of 7·1 months (IQR 3·8–11·0). PFS was significantly improved in the docetaxel plus nintedanib group compared with the docetaxel plus placebo group (median 3·4 months [95% CI 2·9–3·9] vs 2·7 months [2·6–2·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·79 [95% CI 0·68–0·92], p=0·0019). After a median follow-up of 31·7 months (IQR 27·8–36·1), overall survival was significantly improved for patients with adenocarcinoma histology who progressed within 9 months after start of first-line treatment in the docetaxel plus nintedanib group (206 patients) compared with those in the docetaxel plus placebo group (199 patients; median 10·9 months [95% CI 8·5–12·6] vs 7·9 months [6·7–9·1]; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60–0·92], p=0·0073). Similar results were noted for all patients with adenocarcinoma histology (322 patients in the docetaxel plus nintedanib group and 336 in the docetaxel plus placebo group; median overall survival 12·6 months [95% CI 10·6–15·1] vs 10·3 months [95% CI 8·6–12·2]; HR 0·83 [95% CI 0·70–0·99], p=0·0359), but not in the total study population (median 10·1 months [95% CI 8·8–11·2] vs 9·1 months [8·4–10·4]; HR 0·94, 95% CI 0·83–1·05, p=0·2720). Grade 3 or worse adverse events that were more common in the docetaxel plus nintedanib group than in the docetaxel plus placebo group were diarrhoea (43 [6·6%] of 652 vs 17 [2·6%] of 655), reversible increases in alanine aminotransferase (51 [7·8%] vs six [0·9%]), and reversible increases in aspartate aminotransferase (22 [3·4%] vs three [0·5%]). 35 patients in the docetaxel plus nintedanib group and 25 in the docetaxel plus placebo group died of adverse events possibly unrelated to disease progression; the most common of these events were sepsis (five with docetaxel plus nintedanib vs one with docetaxel plus placebo), pneumonia (two vs seven), respiratory failure (four vs none), and pulmonary embolism (none vs three).

Interpretation

Nintedanib in combination with docetaxel is an effective second-line option for patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with one line of platinum-based therapy, especially for patients with adenocarcinoma.

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2014  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 15 - N° 2

P. 143-155 - février 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The Test Of My Life
  • Rob Brierley
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Chemotherapy for isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer (CALOR): a randomised trial
  • Stefan Aebi, Shari Gelber, Stewart J Anderson, István Láng, André Robidoux, Miguel Martín, Johan W R Nortier, Alexander H G Paterson, Mothaffar F Rimawi, José Manuel Baena Cañada, Beat Thürlimann, Elizabeth Murray, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Charles E Geyer, Karen N Price, Alan S Coates, Richard D Gelber, Priya Rastogi, Norman Wolmark, Irene L Wapnir, on behalf of the CALOR investigators †

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.