S'abonner

Predictors of Regional Variations in Hospitalizations Following Emergency Department Visits for Atrial Fibrillation - 23/10/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.005 
Tyler W. Barrett, MD, MSCI a, , Wesley H. Self, MD, MPH a, Cathy A. Jenkins, MS b, Alan B. Storrow, MD a, Benjamin S. Heavrin, MD, MBA a, Candace D. McNaughton, MD, MPH a, Sean P. Collins, MD, MSc a, Jeffrey J. Goldberger, MD c
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 
b Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 
c Division of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 

Corresponding author: Tel: (615) 936-0253; fax: (615) 936-1316.

Abstract

The emergency department (ED) is often where atrial fibrillation (AF) is first detected and acutely treated and affected patients dispositioned. We used the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample to estimate the percentage of visits resulting in hospitalization and investigate associations between patient and hospital characteristics with hospitalization at the national and regional levels. We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults with AF listed as the primary ED diagnosis in the 2007 to 2009 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses investigating the associations between prespecified patient and hospital characteristics with hospitalization. From 2007 to 2009, there were 1,320,123 weighted ED visits for AF, with 69% hospitalized nationally. Mean regional hospitalization proportions were: Northeast (74%), Midwest (68%), South (74%), and West (57%). The highest odds ratios for predicting hospitalization were heart failure (3.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.66 to 4.02), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2.47, 95% CI 2.34 to 2.61), and coronary artery disease (1.65, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.73). After adjusting for age, privately insured (0.77, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.81) and self-pay (0.77 95% CI 0.66 to 0.90) patients had lower odds compared with Medicare recipients, whereas Medicaid (1.21, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.32) patients tended to have higher odds. Patients living in low-income zip codes (1.18, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.25) and patients treated at large metropolitan hospitals (1.75, 95% CI 1.59 to 1.93) had higher odds. In conclusion, our analysis showed considerable regional variation in the management of patients with AF in the ED and in associations between patient socioeconomic and hospital characteristics with ED disposition; adapting best practices from among these variations in management could reduce hospitalizations and health-care expenses.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 No industry financial support or compensation has been or will be received for conducting this study. Dr. Barrett and this study are funded by NIH grant K23 HL102069 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Self is supported in part by an NIH grant KL2TR000446 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Dr. McNaughton is supported by NIH grant HL1K12HL109019 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Collins is supported by NIH grant K23HL085387 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Storrow is supported by NIH grant K12HL1090 and UL1TR000445 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
 See page 1415 for disclosure information.


© 2013  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 112 - N° 9

P. 1410-1416 - novembre 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Comparison of Mortality in Women Versus Men With Infections Involving Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device
  • M. Rizwan Sohail, Charles A. Henrikson, Mary Jo Braid-Forbes, Kevin F. Forbes, Daniel J. Lerner
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients With Resistant Hypertension
  • Marcin Protasiewicz, Jacek K?dziela, Karol Pocz?tek, Rafa? Por?ba, Maciej Podgórski, Arkadiusz Derkacz, Aleksander Prejbisz, Andrzej Mysiak, Andrzej Januszewicz, Adam Witkowski

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.