Performance of Experienced Versus Less Experienced Paramedics in Managing Challenging Scenarios: A Cognitive Task Analysis Study - 19/09/13
Résumé |
Study objective |
Out-of-hospital care is becoming more complex, thus placing greater reliance on the cognitive abilities of paramedics to manage difficult situations. In adapting to the challenges in their work, paramedics develop expertise. We study the cognitive strategies used by expert paramedics to contribute to understanding how paramedics and the EMS system can adapt to new challenges.
Methods |
We conducted a “staged-world” cognitive task analysis to explore paramedics' handling of cognitive challenges related to sense-making and to resource and task management. A mixed-fidelity simulation was used to present paramedics with 2 challenging scenarios: a pulmonary embolism initially presenting as a myocardial infarction and a 2-person shooting with limited resources available.
Results |
Participants were 10 paramedics, 6 more experienced and 4 less experienced. Analysis involved comparing the performance of the 2 groups to identify strategies associated with expertise. The more experienced paramedics made more assessments, explored a wider variety of presumptive diagnoses, and identified the pulmonary embolism earlier. They switched attention between the 2 shooting victims more, used their emergency medical technician–basic level partners more, and provided more advanced level care for both patients. Their patients arrived at the emergency department more prepared for specialized emergency care.
Conclusion |
Our findings correspond to general cognitive attributes of expertise: greater cue gathering and inferential reasoning, and more functional and strategic thinking. These results suggest potential areas and methods to facilitate development of expertise, as well as ways to better support use of expertise. Future studies should expand on these findings through larger sample sizes and more complex scenarios.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
A BZ5KD3K survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
|
Please see page 368 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
Publication date: Available online June 17, 2013. |
|
Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, PhD |
|
Author contributions: MWS, SBS, and DDW conceived of the study. GG supervised recruitment of participants. MWS and GG managed the logistics of the data collection. MWS, MAB, ARF, and SBS developed the study materials and conducted data collection. MWS led the data analysis and drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. MWS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This research was supported by the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, a Google Research Award, and the Department of Integrated Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Ohio State University. |
Vol 62 - N° 4
P. 367-379 - octobre 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?