S'abonner

Critical Care Management ofVerapamil and Diltiazem Overdose With a Focus on Vasopressors: A 25-Year Experience at a Single Center - 20/08/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.03.018 
Michael Levine, MD a, c, d, , Steven C. Curry, MD a, c, Angela Padilla-Jones, RN a, b, Anne-Michelle Ruha, MD a, c
a Department of Medical Toxicology, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 
b Banner Research Institute, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 
c Center for Toxicology and Pharmacology Education and Research, University of Arizona College of Medicine–Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 
d Department of Emergency Medicine, Section of Medical Toxicology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 

Address for correspondence: Michael Levine, MD

Résumé

Study objective

Verapamil or diltiazem overdose can cause severe morbidity and death, and there exist limited human data describing management and outcome of a large number of such patients. This article describes the management and outcome of patients with nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker overdose, with an emphasis on vasopressor dosing, at a single center.

Methods

This study is a retrospective chart review of patients older than 14 years and admitted to the inpatient toxicology service of a single tertiary care medical center for treatment of verapamil or diltiazem overdose from 1987 through 2012, and who had the presence of either drug confirmed by urine drug screening. Patients were identified by review of patient encounter logs. Data abstracted from medical records included demographics, laboratory results, drugs used to support blood pressure, complications, and outcomes. A second group included patients with a reported calcium channel blocker ingestion but for whom results of the urine drug testing were no longer available. In an effort to assess selection bias, this group was included to determine whether patients who were excluded from the primary group only because of unavailability of urine drug screen results had different outcomes.

Results

During the study period, 48 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 45 years, with a range of 15 to 76 years, and 52% were male patients. Verapamil accounted for 24 of 48 (50%) ingestions. Vasopressors were administered to 33 of 48 (69%) patients. Maximal vasopressor infusion doses were epinephrine 150 μg/minute, dopamine 100 μg/kg per minute, dobutamine 245 μg/kg per minute, isoproterenol 60 μg/minute, phenylephrine 250 μg/minute, and norepinephrine 100 μg/minute. The use of multiple vasopressors was common. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemia was used in 3 patients who also received multiple vasopressors. Eight probable or possible ischemic complications were noted in 5 of 48 (10%) patients. Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 3 of 48 (6%) patients; a brain magnetic resonance imaging in 1 patient suggested mild ischemia, without clinical evidence of infarction; 1 patient had ischemic bowel; and 3 patients developed renal failure from acute tubular necrosis, which resolved in each case. Six of the 8 ischemic complications were evident before use of vasopressor therapy. Three patients sustained inhospital cardiac arrest before admission and were successfully resuscitated. Each of these arrests occurred before instituting vasopressor infusions. One patient experienced a late cardiac arrest from primary respiratory arrest from administration of sedatives, and multiple organ system failure followed resuscitation, with death occurring during manipulation of a pulmonary artery catheter. The remaining 47 patients recovered. There were 12 patients in the group of additional poisoned patients for whom results of urine drug screening were unavailable. Four patients were treated with vasopressors, 2 experienced acute tubular necrosis that was present before vasopressor use, and all recovered.

Conclusion

In our series of patients admitted with verapamil or diltiazem overdose, hypotension was common and managed with the use of multiple vasopressors and without hyperinsulinemic euglycemia in all but 3 cases. Despite high doses of vasopressors, ischemic complications were the exception and were usually present before use of vasopressors. Death occurred in a single patient whose death was not attributed directly to calcium-channel blocker toxicity. Vasopressor use after verapamil or diltiazem overdose was associated with good clinical outcomes without permanent sequelae.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 A SK3BPST survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
 Supervising editor: Richard C. Dart, MD, PhD
 Author contributions: ML, SCC, and A-MR were responsible for study design. ML, SCC, and AP-J were responsible for data abstraction. ML and SCC were responsible for data analysis. All authors were responsible for preparing the article. ML takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.
 Please see page 253 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
 Publication date: Available online May 1, 2013.


© 2013  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 62 - N° 3

P. 252-258 - septembre 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • A 9-State Analysis of Designer Stimulant, “Bath Salt,” Hospital Visits Reported to Poison Control Centers
  • Brandon J. Warrick, Meredith Hill, Kimberly Hekman, Rachelle Christensen, Robert Goetz, Marcel J. Casavant, Michael Wahl, James B. Mowry, Henry Spiller, Deborah Anderson, Alfred Aleguas, David Gummin, Ronald Thomas, Christopher Nezlek, Susan Smolinske
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • What Is the Best Treatment for Acute Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose?
  • Kent R. Olson

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.