421 – Full cycle audit of the quality of fall reviews by junior doctors in oxford deanery - 09/07/13
Résumé |
Background |
Elderly psychiatric patients are at constant risk of having a fall due to numerous reasons e.g. frailty, gait problem, vision problem, cognitive and judgment impairment, psychotropic medications.
Consequences of a fall for an elderly patient could be potentially life threatening, protracted, painful and detrimental. Also the cost of falls for NHS is enormous.
Objective |
To improve the quality of fall reviews undertaken by junior doctors in Oxford Health Foundation Trust.
Methods |
The quality of a random sample of 23 fall reviews by junior doctors was assessed against the national guideline (NICE guideline No.: CG21).
Proper actions taken to raise the awareness of junior doctors i.e. circulating an email and short talk about national standards.
The second cycle (Sample size: 17) in 6 months time showed substantial improvement in most areas but not all of them.
In the next stage a “Fall intervention proforma” designed for the wards. Also reminding posters were mounted in clinical rooms and junior doctors’ offices.
The third cycle (Sample size: 10) in 6 months time conducted to assess the sustainability of improvements in our compliance.
Results |
Our compliance improved from less than 50% in most essential components of a high quality fall review (Musculoskeletal examination, Neurological examination, History taking, Cardiovascular examination, Medication review) to around 100% in 3rd cycle.
Recommendations |
– | routine use of “Fall intervention proforma” as standard check list on the wards |
– | mounting of reminding posters in clinical rooms |
– | a short talk about fall reviews in induction programme for new junior doctors |
Vol 28 - N° S1
P. 1 - 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?