S'abonner

Patient Satisfaction With Rapid HIV Testing in the Emergency Department - 22/06/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.024 
Laurel Donnell-Fink, MPH a, William M. Reichmann, MA a, d, Christian Arbelaez, MD, MPH b, e, Amy L. Case, BA b, Jeffrey N. Katz, MD, MSc a, e, f, Elena Losina, PhD a, d, e, Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH c, e, g,
a Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 
c Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 
d Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 
e Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 
f Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 
g Divisions of Infectious Diseases and General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 

Address for correspondence Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH, Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; 617-724-3467, fax 617-726-2691

Résumé

Objective

Patient satisfaction with HIV screening is crucial for sustainable implementation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) HIV testing recommendations. This investigation assesses patient satisfaction with rapid HIV testing in the emergency department (ED) of an urban tertiary academic medical center.

Methods

After receiving HIV test results, participants in the Universal Screening for HIV Infection in the Emergency Room (USHER) randomized controlled trial were offered a patient satisfaction survey. Questions concerned overall satisfaction with ED visit, time spent on primary medical problem, time spent on HIV testing, and test provider's ability to answer HIV-related questions. Responses were reported on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied (defined as optimal satisfaction).

Results

Of 4,860 USHER participants, 2,025 completed testing and were offered the survey: 1,616 (79.8%) completed the survey. Overall, 1,478 (91.5%) were very satisfied. Satisfaction was less than optimal for 34.5% (10 of 29) of participants with reactive results and for 7.5% (115 of 1,542) with nonreactive results. The independent factors associated with less than optimal satisfaction were reactive test result, aged 60 years or older, black race, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and testing by ED provider instead of HIV counselor.

Conclusion

Most participants were very satisfied with the ED-based rapid HIV testing program. Identification of independent factors that correlate with patient satisfaction will help guide best practices as EDs implement CDC recommendations. It is critical to better understand whether patients with reactive results were negatively affected by their results or truly had concerns about the testing process.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). This work was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH073445, R01 MH65869) and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Clinical Scientist Development Award, to Rochelle P. Walensky. No authors have conflicts of interest to disclose.
 Publication of this article was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.


© 2011  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 58 - N° 1S

P. S49-S52 - juillet 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Less Encouraging Lessons From the Front Lines: Barriers to Implementation of an Emergency Department-Based HIV Screening Program
  • Bryn E. Mumma, Brian P. Suffoletto
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Physician-Initiated Rapid HIV Testing in an Urban Emergency Department: Comparison of Testing Using a Point-of-Care Versus a Laboratory Model
  • Douglas A.E. White, Tony Tran, Patrick J. Dideum, Farnaz Vahidnia, Danielle M. Gordon, Valerie Ng, Bradley W. Frazee

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.