Treatment outcomes according to endoscopic treatment modalities for rectal carcinoid tumors - 06/06/13
Corresponding author. Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50, Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82 2 3410 3409; fax: +82 2 3410 6983.Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
| pages | 8 |
| Iconographies | 1 |
| Vidéos | 0 |
| Autres | 0 |
Summary |
Background |
Despite a growing understanding of the clinical effectiveness of endoscopic treatment for small rectal carcinoid tumors, there is still controversy concerning the best endoscopic treatment for resecting rectal carcinoid tumors easily and effectively.
Objectives |
The objective of the present study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for rectal carcinoid tumors. In addition, a conventional snare-based endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was included in the study and compared with both ESMR-L and ESD.
Methods |
A retrospective analysis was performed in 115 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of a rectal carcinoid tumor between January 2005 and June 2011. These patients were classified into three groups according to the type of endoscopic procedure: EMR group (n=33), ESMR-L group (n=40) and ESD group (n=44).
Results |
The complete resection rate of the EMR group was significantly lower than those of the ESMR-L and ESD groups (77.4 vs. 100 and 97.7%, P=0.002 and P=0.007). Tumor-free vertical margins were significantly greater in the ESMR-L and ESD groups than in the EMR group (ESMR-L and ESD vs. EMR group, P=0.013 and P=0.041). The curative resection rate of rectal carcinoid tumors in the EMR group was 77.4%, which was significantly lower than that of the ESMR-L (95%, 38/40) and EDS groups (97.7%, 43/44) (77.4% vs. 95%, P=0.036 and 77.4% vs. 97.7%, P=0.007).
Conclusions |
Our results show that ESMR-L and ESD might be superior to conventional EMR for the treatment of small rectal carcinoid tumors.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 37 - N° 3
P. 275-282 - juin 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Expression of TRAIL in liver tissue from patients with different outcomes of HBV infection
- Fan-wei Liu, Dong-bo Wu, En-qiang Chen, Cong Liu, Li Liu, Shou-chun Chen, Dao-yin Gong, Lian-san Zhao, Hong Tang, Tao-you Zhou
- Effects of psychological nursing intervention on personality characteristics and quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer
- Qiao-mei Cheng, Cun-quan Kong, Shu-ying Chang, Ai-huan Wei
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?