S'abonner

Photodynamic therapy versus topical imiquimod versus topical fluorouracil for treatment of superficial basal-cell carcinoma: a single blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial - 29/05/13

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70143-8 
Aimée HMM Arits, DrPhD a, c, , Klara Mosterd, PhD a, c, Brigitte AB Essers, PhD b, Eefje Spoorenberg, MD a, d, Anja Sommer, PhD a, c, e, Michette JM De Rooij, PhD f, Han PA van Pelt, PhD f, Patricia JF Quaedvlieg, PhD g, Gertruud AM Krekels, PhD h, Pierre AFA van Neer, PhD i, Joris J Rijzewijk, PhD j, Adrienne J van Geest, MD k, Peter M Steijlen, PhD a, c, Patty J Nelemans, PhD l, Nicole WJ Kelleners-Smeets, PhD a, c
a Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands 
b Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands 
c GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands 
d Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands 
e Department of Dermatology, Kolbach Clinic, Maastricht, Netherlands 
f Department of Dermatology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands 
g Department of Dermatology, Atrium Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands 
h Department of Dermatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands 
i Department of Dermatology, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, Netherlands 
j Department of Dermatology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, Netherlands 
k Department of Dermatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands 
l Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands 

*Correspondence to: Dr Aimée H M M Arits, Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P Debyelaan 25, 6229HX Maastricht, Netherlands

Summary

Background

Superficial basal-cell carcinoma is most commonly treated with topical non-surgical treatments, such as photodynamic therapy or topical creams. Photodynamic therapy is considered the preferable treatment, although this has not been previously tested in a randomised control trial. We assessed the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy compared with imiquimod or fluorouracil in patients with superficial basal-cell carcinoma.

Methods

In this single blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled multicentre trial, we enrolled patients with a histologically proven superficial basal-cell carcinoma at seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT; two sessions with an interval of 1 week), imiquimod cream (once daily, five times a week for 6 weeks), or fluorouracil cream (twice daily for 4 weeks). Follow-up was at 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Data were collected by one observer who was blinded to the assigned treatment. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients free of tumour at both 3 and 12 month follow up. A pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 10% was used and modified intention-to-treat analyses were done. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 79701845).

Findings

601 patients were randomised: 202 to receive MAL-PDT, 198 to receive imiquimod, and 201 to receive fluorouracil. A year after treatment, 52 of 196 patients treated with MAL-PDT, 31 of 189 treated with imiquimod, and 39 of 198 treated with fluorouracil had tumour residue or recurrence. The proportion of patients tumour-free at both 3 and 12 month follow-up was 72·8% (95% CI 66·8–79·4) for MAL-PDT, 83·4% (78·2–88·9) for imiquimod cream, and 80·1% (74·7–85·9) for fluorouracil cream. The difference between imiquimod and MAL-PDT was 10·6% (95% CI 1·5–19·5; p=0·021) and 7·3% (–1·9 to 16·5; p=0·120) between fluorouracil and MAL-PDT, and between fluorouracil and imiquimod was −3·3% (–11·6 to 5·0; p=0·435. For patients treated with MAL-PDT, moderate to severe pain and burning sensation were reported most often during the actual MAL-PDT session. For other local adverse reactions, local skin redness was most often reported as moderate or severe in all treatment groups. Patients treated with creams more often reported moderate to severe local swelling, erosion, crust formation, and itching of the skin than patients treated with MAL-PDT. In the MAL-PDT group no serious adverse events were reported. One patient treated with imiquimod and two patients treated with fluorouracil developed a local wound infection and needed additional treatment in the outpatient setting.

Interpretation

Topical fluorouracil was non-inferior and imiquimod was superior to MAL-PDT for treatment of superficial basal-cell carcinoma. On the basis of these findings, imiquimod can be considered the preferred treatment, but all aspects affecting treatment choice should be weighted to select the best treatment for patients.

Funding

Grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ZONMW (08-82310-98-08626).

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2013  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 14 - N° 7

P. 647-654 - juin 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Effects of a programme of interventions on regional comprehensive palliative care for patients with cancer: a mixed-methods study
  • Tatsuya Morita, Mitsunori Miyashita, Akemi Yamagishi, Miki Akiyama, Nobuya Akizuki, Kei Hirai, Chizuru Imura, Masashi Kato, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Yutaka Shirahige, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Kenji Eguchi
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial
  • Baki Topal, Steffen Fieuws, Raymond Aerts, Joseph Weerts, Tom Feryn, Geert Roeyen, Claude Bertrand, Catherine Hubert, Marc Janssens, Jean Closset, on behalf of the Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.