S'abonner

Who else is providing care in dermatology practices? Trends in the use of nonphysician clinicians - 24/04/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.032 
Jack S. Resneck, MD a, , Alexa B. Kimball, MD, MPH b
a Department of Dermatology, and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 
b Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 

Reprint requests: Jack S. Resneck Jr, MD, University of California, San Francisco, Dermatology, Box 0316, San Francisco, CA 94143-0316.

Abstract

Background

The US dermatology workforce, which is affected by a physician shortage, has reportedly seen a rapid and substantial influx of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs). Little is known about which dermatology practices use these practitioners, how they are supervised, and the services they are providing.

Methods

We analyzed results of the American Academy of Dermatology’s 2007 practice profile survey to learn more about patterns of nonphysician clinician (NPC) use. Of 3965 surveys mailed, responses were obtained from 1243 dermatologists (31% response rate). Comparison data were drawn from previous surveys conducted with a similar methodology in 2002 (35% response rate) and 2005 (30% response rate).

Results

Overall, 325 responding dermatologists (29.6%) reported using PAs, NPs, or both in their practices in 2007, a 43% increase from the proportion in 2002 (20.7%). PAs were more prevalent than NPs (23% vs 10%). By the year 2010, 36.2% of respondents plan to hire these NPCs. Younger cohorts of dermatologists were significantly more likely to use NPCs (P = .006), as were those in group and academic practices (P < .0001). Respondents seeking to hire additional dermatologists (P < .0001) and those with surgical or cosmetically focused practices (P < .001) were much more likely to use NPCs. Respondents reported supervising their NPCs on-site 92.8% of the time, but 31% were off-site 10% of the time or more. Most dermatologists allowed their NPCs to see new patients and established patients with new problems, and a minority of these patients were formally presented to a physician during extender visits. NPCs spent the majority of their time seeing medical dermatology patients, even if their supervising dermatologist was primarily engaged in surgical or cosmetic dermatology.

Limitations

Survey respondents might have inaccurately reported practice characteristics or might not be representative of all US dermatologists.

Conclusions

In the setting of persistently long patient wait times and difficulty recruiting new physician staff, dermatologists have rapidly turned to PAs and NPs to help meet patient demand for care. These NPCs are primarily caring for new and established medical dermatology patients under indirect supervision. In the absence of explicit consensus or policy as to how the field should ensure future access to care for patients with skin disease, growth in the use of NPCs has continued, with significant variation in use and supervision patterns.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations used : AAD, NP, NPC, PA


Plan


 The practice profile surveys were funded by the American Academy of Dermatology Association, which had no role in our independent analyses; interpretation of data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
 Disclosure: Dr Resneck received a career development award from the Dermatology Foundation and chairs the Workforce Task Force of the American Academy of Dermatology. Dr Kimball has no conflicts of interest to declare.
 Limited preliminary results were presented in abstract form at the 2007 American Association of Medical Colleges Workforce Meeting, Bethesda, Maryland, May 3, 2007.


© 2008  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 58 - N° 2

P. 211-216 - février 2008 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings
  • Margaret A. Fonder, Gerald S. Lazarus, David A. Cowan, Barbara Aronson-Cook, Angela R. Kohli, Adam J. Mamelak
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Expression patterns of the glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor, neurturin, their cognate receptors GFR⍺-1, GFR⍺-2, and a common signal transduction element c-Ret in the human skin hair follicles
  • Mohamed A. Adly, Hanan A. Assaf, Paolo Pertile, Mahmoud R. Hussein, Ralf Paus

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.