S'abonner

Cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments for psoriasis based on subjective and objective efficacy measures assessed over a 12-week treatment period - 24/04/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.018 
Andrew A. Nelson, MD a, Daniel J. Pearce, MD b, Alan B. Fleischer, MD b, Rajesh Balkrishnan, PhD c, Steven R. Feldman, MD, PhD b,
a Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 
b Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 
c Ohio State University College of Pharmacy and School of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio 

Reprint requests: Steven Feldman, MD, PhD, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1071.

Abstract

Background

The cost-effectiveness of biologic agents is not well delineated.

Objective

To determine the cost-effectiveness of biologic agents in cost per patient achieving a minimally important difference in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI MID) and cost per patient achieving a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75), assessed over a 12-week period.

Method

Efficacies of the agents were determined through a literature review; treatment paradigms and associated costs were determined. The cost-effectiveness of the agents was determined and sensitivity analysis performed.

Results

Etanercept at a dose of 25 mg administered subcutaneously (SQ) once weekly was the most cost-effective agent in cost per patient achieving DLQI minimally important difference; infliximab at a dose of 3 mg/kg administered intravenously (IV) for 3 infusions, adalimumab at a dose of 40 mg SQ every other week, and etanercept at a dose of 25 mg SQ twice weekly were the next most cost-effective agents in cost per patient achieving the DLQI minimally important difference. Intravenous infliximab at a dose of 3 mg/kg was the most cost-effective agent in terms of cost per patient achieving PASI-75 improvement; intravenous infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg and adalimumab at a dose of 40 mg SQ every other week were the next most cost-effective agents in cost per patient achieving PASI-75 improvement.

Limitations

This study had a limited time horizon of 12 weeks; generalizing the results to longer treatment periods may not be accurate and is not advisable. Additionally, when sensitivity analyses were performed, multiple agents had overlapping cost-effectiveness ratios at relatively low levels of variance; thus it may not be accurate to differentiate the cost-effectiveness of these agents.

Conclusions

Different biologic agents for psoriasis appear to have different cost-effectiveness values; within the limitations of the available data, infliximab and adalimumab appear to be the most cost-effective agents.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations used : DLQI, DLQI MID, FDA, HRQOL, IV, MID, PASI-75, QOL, RCT, SQ


Plan


 The Center for Dermatology Research is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
 Disclosure: Dr Feldman has received research, speaking, and/or consulting support from Abbott, Amgen, Astellas, Biogen, Centocor, Connetics, Genentech, and Roche. Dr Pearce has been a consultant for Biogen. Drs Nelson, Fleischer, and Balkrishnan have no conflicts of interest to declare.


© 2008  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 58 - N° 1

P. 125-135 - janvier 2008 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Alefacept revisited: Our 3-year clinical experience in 200 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis
  • Amy Perlmutter, Jennifer Cather, Billy Franks, Eileen Jaracz, Alan Menter
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Validity of self-reported nail counts in patients with onychomycosis: A retrospective pilot analysis
  • Peter M.H. Cham, Suephy C. Chen, Joseph P. Grill, Erin M. Warshaw

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.