Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts - 18/04/13
, Kelley Redbord, MD b, c, d, James S. Taylor, MD e, Alison Shippy, MPH f, James Kostecki, MS f, Robert Swerlick, MD g
Reprint requests: Alice J. Watson, MD, MPH, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.Abstract |
Background |
To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice.
Objective |
We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice.
Methods |
A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology.
Results |
The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively.
Limitations |
Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete.
Conclusion |
Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : medical error, patient safety, practice improvement, quality of care, Universal Protocol, wrong-site surgery
Plan
| This was a project of the Adverse Events Work Group of the Committee on Patient Safety and Quality of Care, American Academy of Dermatology; nominal administrative costs. |
|
| Conflicts of interest: None declared. |
Vol 68 - N° 5
P. 729-737 - mai 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Short- and long-term outcomes of 34 patients with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in a single institution
- Yukiko Ushigome, Yoko Kano, Tadashi Ishida, Kazuhisa Hirahara, Tetsuo Shiohara
- Pediatric access to dermatologists: Medicaid versus private insurance
- Sofia B. Chaudhry, Eric S. Armbrecht, Yoon Shin, Sarah Matula, Charles Caffrey, Reena Varade, Lisa Jones, Elaine Siegfried
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?