Small-airways dysfunction associates with respiratory symptoms and clinical features of asthma: A systematic review - 27/02/13
Abstract |
Traditionally, asthma has been considered a disease that predominantly involves the large airways. Today, this concept is being challenged, and increasing evidence has become available showing that abnormalities in the small airways also contribute to the clinical expression of asthma. The small airways can be affected by inflammation, remodeling, and changes in the surrounding tissue, all contributing to small-airways dysfunction. In this article we have performed a systematic review of the literature on the association between small-airways dysfunction and clinical signs and symptoms of asthma. This review shows that small-airways dysfunction associates with worse control of asthma, higher numbers of exacerbations, the presence of nocturnal asthma, more severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness, exercise-induced asthma, and the late-phase allergic response. Importantly, small-airways dysfunction can already be present in patients with mild asthma. Our review provides suggestive evidence that a better response of the small airways to inhaled steroids or montelukast associates with better asthma control. For this reason, an early recognition of small-airways dysfunction is important because it enables the physician to start timely treatment to target the small airways. It is important to develop simpler and more reliable tools (eg, questionnaires or bronchial provocation tests with small-particle stimuli) to assess the presence and extent of small-airways dysfunction in daily clinical practice.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Small-airways disease, asthma, phenotypes, asthma control
Abbreviations used : ACQ, AX, BAL, BDP, BHR, CFC, DPI, FEF25%-75%, FEF50%, HDM, HFA, ICS, MBNW, MMAD, NO, PEF, PM2.5, PM10, R5, R20, R5-R20, RV, Sacin, SBNT, Scond, TLC
Plan
Supported by Chiesi. |
|
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: D. S. Postma has received grants from the Dutch Asthma Foundation, NWO, ZonMw, SAB, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi and has received travel support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Nycomed/Takeda. M. van den Berge has consulted for GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis and has received payment for a lecture for Nycomed. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 131 - N° 3
P. 646-657 - mars 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?