High-SPF sunscreens (SPF ≥ 70) may provide ultraviolet protection above minimal recommended levels by adequately compensating for lower sunscreen user application amounts - 14/11/12
, Joseph Stanfield, MS b, Curtis Cole, PhD c, Yohini Appa, PhD a, Darrell Rigel, MD d
Reprint requests: Hao Ou-Yang, PhD, Neutrogena Corp, 5760 W 96 St, Los Angeles, CA 90045.Abstract |
Background |
The manner in which consumers apply sunscreens is often inadequate for ultraviolet protection according to the labeled sun protection factor (SPF). Although sunscreen SPFs are labeled by testing at an application density of 2 mg/cm2, the actual protection received is often substantially less because of consumer application densities ranging from 0.5 to 1 mg/cm2. High-SPF sunscreens may provide more adequate protection even when applied by consumers at inadequate amounts.
Objective |
We sought to measure the actual SPF values of various sunscreens (labeled SPF 30-100) applied in amounts typical of those used by consumers.
Methods |
Actual SPF values were measured on human volunteers for 6 sunscreen products with labeled SPF values ranging from 30 to 100, applied at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/cm2.
Results |
There was a linear relationship between application density and the actual SPF; sunscreens with labeled SPF values of 70 and above provided significant protection, even at the low application densities typically applied by consumers. Sunscreens labeled SPF 70 and 100 applied at 0.5 mg/cm2 provided an actual SPF value of, respectively, 19 and 27.
Limitations |
The study was conducted in a laboratory setting under standardized conditions and results are extrapolated to actual in-use situations.
Conclusion |
Sunscreens with SPF 70 and above add additional clinical benefits when applied by consumers at typically used amounts, by delivering an actual SPF that meets the minimum SPF levels recommended for skin cancer and photodamage prevention. In contrast, sunscreens with SPF 30 or 50 may not produce sufficient protection at actual consumer usage levels.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : minimal erythema dose, sun protection, sunburn, sunburn protection factor, sunscreens, ultraviolet protection
Abbreviations used : FDA, MED, SPF, UV
Plan
| Funded in full by Neutrogena Corp; the preparation of this manuscript was sponsored in full by Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies. |
|
| Disclosure: Drs Ou-Yang and Appa are employees of Neutrogena Corp, the manufacturer of two of the sunscreens tested. Dr Cole is an employee of Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, a sister company of Neutrogena Corp. Mr Stanfield is an employee of Suncare Research Laboratories, the independent testing laboratory that received compensation for conducting this study, and he is currently a consultant to Galderma Laboratories LP. Dr Rigel is a consultant for Neutrogena Corp, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, Beiersdorf, and P&G. |
Vol 67 - N° 6
P. 1220-1227 - décembre 2012 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Hypertrophy in port-wine stains: Prevalence and patient characteristics in a large patient cohort
- Anne Margreet van Drooge, Johan F. Beek, J.P. Wietze van der Veen, Chantal M.A.M. van der Horst, Albert Wolkerstorfer
- Sebaceous neoplasms with mismatch repair protein expressions and the frequency of co-existing visceral tumors
- Bonnie A. Lee, Limin Yu, Linglei Ma, Anne C. Lind, Dongsi Lu
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?