S'abonner

Can Broad-Range 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reactions Improve the Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis - 20/10/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.05.040 
Lakshmi Srinivasan, MBBS a, b, , Jared M. Pisapia, MD, MTR b, d, Samir S. Shah, MD, MSCE c, Casey H. Halpern, MD b, d, Mary C. Harris, MD a, b
a Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 
b Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 
c Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 
d Department of Neurosurgery, the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 

Address for correspondence: Lakshmi Srinivasan, MBBS

Résumé

Study objective

We aim to evaluate the accuracy of the broad-range 16S polymerase chain reaction test in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, using the Medical Subject Headings terms “polymerase chain reaction,” “RNA, ribosomal, 16S,” and “bacterial meningitis.” For our primary analysis, we examined the 16S polymerase chain reaction in culture-proven bacterial meningitis. In ancillary observations, we included studies of culture-negative presumed bacterial meningitis, in which there was high clinical suspicion for bacterial meningitis despite negative cerebrospinal fluid culture results. We extracted information necessary to calculate sensitivity and specificity and used bivariate hierarchic modeling meta-analysis methods to obtain pooled statistics. We also estimated potential sources of error and bias such as between-study heterogeneity and publication bias.

Results

Fourteen of 299 studies met inclusion criteria for culture-proven bacterial meningitis; 448 (16.1%) of 2,780 subjects had positive cerebrospinal fluid culture results. Pooled analysis demonstrated a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75% to 98%), specificity of 94% (95% CI 90% to 97%), positive likelihood ratio of 16.26 (95% CI 9.07 to 29.14), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.28) for culture-proven bacterial meningitis. The polymerase chain reaction test result was also positive in 30% of cases of culture-negative presumed bacterial meningitis. There was significant heterogeneity between studies.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis supports the role of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid polymerase chain reaction as a diagnostic tool in bacterial meningitis. With further refinements in technology, the polymerase chain reaction test has the potential to become a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis in the emergency department.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 A process.asp?qs_id=8156 survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. Dr. Harris received support from the University Research Foundation (University of Pennsylvania) and the Foerderer Murray Award (The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia). Dr. Shah received support from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K01 AI73729) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation under its Physician Faculty Scholar Program.
 Please see page 610 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
 Publication date: Available online August 9, 2012.
 Supervising editor: David A. Talan, MD
 Author contributions: LS conceived the study idea. LS and JMP performed the literature search, data collection, and primary data analysis. All authors contributed to the study design. All authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data and article revision. LS drafted the article and takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 The content of the article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.


© 2012  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 60 - N° 5

P. 609 - novembre 2012 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • In the Child With Gastroenteritis Who Is Unable to Tolerate Oral Fluids, Are There Effective Alternatives to Intravenous Hydration?
  • Lisa T. Barker
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Harnessing Genomic Approaches for Infectious Disease Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine: Getting Closer to Prime Time
  • Richard E. Rothman, Samuel Yang, Justin Hardick, Charlotte A. Gaydos

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.