S'abonner

Time to biochemical failure and prostate-specific antigen doubling time as surrogates for prostate cancer-specific mortality: evidence from the TROG 96.01 randomised controlled trial - 26/09/12

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70236-5 
James W Denham, ProfFRANZCR a, , Allison Steigler, BMath a, Chantelle Wilcox, BBiomedSc a, David S Lamb, FRANZCR d, David Joseph, ProfFRANZCR e, Chris Atkinson, FRANZCR f, John Matthews, FRANZCR g, Keen-Hun Tai, FRANZCR h, Nigel A Spry, ProfFRANZCR e, David Christie, FRANZCR i, Paul S Gleeson a, Peter B Greer, PhD b, Catherine D’Este, ProfPhD c

on behalf of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.01 Trialists

  Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.01 Trialists listed in Web Extra Material

a School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia 
b School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia 
c Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia 
d Wellington Cancer Centre, Wellington, New Zealand 
e Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia 
f Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand 
g Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand 
h Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
i Premion, Tugun, QLD, Australia 

* Correspondence to: Prof James W Denham, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Locked Bag 7, Hunter Region Mail Centre, NSW 2310, Australia

Summary

Background

Surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific mortality after curative primary treatment are not well established. We sought to assess time to biochemical failure (TTBF) and prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) after failure of curative treatment as candidates for this endpoint.

Methods

PSA and survival data from the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 96.01 trial were used to assess surrogate candidates. Between June 28, 1996, and Feb 16, 2000, 802 eligible men with locally advanced prostate cancer were randomly allocated to prostatic irradiation alone, or to 3 or 6 months of maximum short-term androgen deprivation (STAD) before and during radiation. Successful surrogates were required to satisfy the Prentice criteria and to predict the trial finding. The TROG 96.01 trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12607000237482.

Findings

6 months of STAD was shown to significantly decrease prostate cancer-specific mortality compared with radiation alone, but 3 months of STAD did not result in a decrease. Relative to radiation alone, the hazard ratio of prostate cancer-specific mortality from randomisation was 0·95 (95% CI 0·63–1·41; p=0·79) in the 3-month STAD treatment arm and 0·56 (0·36–0·88; p=0·01) in the 6-month arm. PSADT predicted the trial finding and satisfied all four Prentice criteria at the cutpoints of less than 12 months and less than 15 months, with proportion of treatment effect ratios between 0·36 and 0·56. Time to biochemical failure was better than PSADT at predicting the trial finding and satisfying all four Prentice criteria at cutpoints of less than 1·5, less than 2, and less than 2·5 years, with proportion of treatment effect ratios between 0·45 and 0·64.

Interpretation

This study provides proof of principle that TTBF and PSADT can be useful as surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific mortality and offer potential to substantially reduce follow up in clinical trials. These endpoints now require assessment in multi-trial meta-analyses before use in clinical trials.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia; Project Grant Applications 9936572, 209801, 455520); Hunter Medical Research Institute (Newcastle, NSW, Australia); AstraZeneca (Sydney, NSW, Australia); and Schering-Plough (Sydney, NSW, Australia).

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2008  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 9 - N° 11

P. 1058-1068 - novembre 2008 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Increased telomerase activity and comprehensive lifestyle changes: a pilot study
  • Dean Ornish, Jue Lin, Jennifer Daubenmier, Gerdi Weidner, Elissa Epel, Colleen Kemp, Mark Jesus M Magbanua, Ruth Marlin, Loren Yglecias, Peter R Carroll, Elizabeth H Blackburn
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Preserving function and quality of life after thyroid and parathyroid surgery
  • Joel T Adler, Rebecca S Sippel, Sarah Schaefer, Herbert Chen

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.