S'abonner

Effectiveness of a Radiofrequency Detection System as an Adjunct to Manual Counting Protocols for Tracking Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Trial of 2,285 Patients - 14/09/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.014 
Christopher C. Rupp, MD, FACS a, , Mary J. Kagarise, RN, MSPH a, Stella M. Nelson, RN, MA, CNOR b, Allison M. Deal, MS c, Susan Phillips, RN, MBA, CNOR b, Janet Chadwick, RN, MBA, CNOR b, Tamara Petty, RN, CNOR b, Anthony A. Meyer, MD, PhD, FACS a, Hong Jin Kim, MD, FACS a
a University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 
b University of North Carolina Health Care System, Chapel Hill, NC 
c University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, Chapel Hill, NC 

Correspondence address: Christopher C Rupp, MD, FACS, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4035 Burnett-Womack Bldg, CB #7081, Chapel Hill, NC 27599

Résumé

Background

Despite rigorous manual counting protocols and the classification of retained surgical items (RSIs) as potential “never events,” RSIs continue to occur in approximately 1 per 1,000 to 18,000 operations. This study's goals were to evaluate the incorporation of a radiofrequency detection system (RFDS) into existing laparotomy sponge- and Raytec-counting protocols for the detection of RSIs and define associated risk factors.

Study Design

All patients undergoing surgery at the University of North Carolina Hospitals from September 2009 to August 2010 were enrolled consecutively. The performance of an RFDS-incorporated accounting protocol for detecting RSIs was prospectively evaluated. Several operative metrics were recorded to identify risk factors for miscounts.

Results

A total of 2,285 patients were enrolled. One near miss was detected by the RFDS. Thirty-five miscounts occurred, for a rate of 1.53%. The ultimate locations of miscounted items were surgical site (n = 11), within operative suite (n = 10), surgical drapes (n = 2), and emergency protocol deviations (n = 12). Perioperative variables associated with miscounts were higher estimated volume of blood lost, longer operations, higher number of laparotomy sponges used, open surgical approach, “after hours” operations, change of surgical team during operation, weekend or holiday operations, unanticipated changes in operative plan during surgery, and emergency operations. Body mass index was not associated with miscounts. Surveys completed by participating surgical staff suggested high confidence in the RFDS for prevention of RSIs.

Conclusions

The incorporation of the RFDS assisted in the resolution of a near-miss event (1 of 2,285) not detected by manual counting protocols and assisted in the resolution of 35 surgical-sponge miscounts. No known RSIs occurred during the study period. Risk factors for miscounts were identified and can help identify at-risk surgical populations.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.
 This study was supported by a grant from RF Surgical Systems, Inc. for materials used during the study period.


© 2012  American College of Surgeons. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 215 - N° 4

P. 524-533 - octobre 2012 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Tracking Intraoperative Complications
  • Joseph Platz, Neil Hyman
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Heparin-Binding Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factor and Mesenchymal Stem Cells Act Synergistically to Prevent Experimental Necrotizing Enterocolitis
  • Jixin Yang, Daniel Watkins, Chun-Liang Chen, Bharath Bhushan, Yu Zhou, Gail E. Besner

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.