S'abonner

Increasing Computed Tomography Use for Patients With Appendicitis and Discrepancies in Pain Management Between Adults and Children: An Analysis of the NHAMCS - 21/04/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.010 
Daniel S. Tsze, MD, MPH a, b, , Lisa M. Asnis, ScM c, Roland C. Merchant, MD, MPH b, c, Siraj Amanullah, MD, MPH a, b, James G. Linakis, PhD, MD a, b
a Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 
c Department of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 

Address for correspondence: Daniel S. Tsze, MD, MPH

Résumé

Study objective

Using a national sample of emergency department (ED) visits, we aim to describe use of CBC, computed tomography (CT), and pain medication among ED visits in which appendicitis was diagnosed. We describe use trends over time and identify use differences between adults and children.

Methods

The ED component of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was analyzed for 1992 through 2006, comprising a sample of 447,011 visits (representing an estimated total of approximately 1.5 billion visits), from which a sample of 1,088 patients (representing an estimated 3.7 million patients) received a diagnosis of appendicitis. The frequency of CBC and CT use and frequency of pain medication administration were determined. Survey-adjusted regression analyses were used to determine the probability of a patient receiving CBC, CT, or pain medication. Use was compared between adults and children.

Results

During the course of the study, from 1996 to 2006, the percentage of patients with appendicitis who received a CT scan increased from 6.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0% to 15.3%) to 69% (95% CI 55.5% to 81.7%) for adults and from 0% to 59.8% (95% CI 31.6% to 87.9%) for children. CBC use for adults increased from 77.2% (95% CI 62.9% to 91.5%) to 92.8% (95% CI 85.8% to 99.7%) and decreased from 89.1% (95% CI 74.9% to 100.0%) to 68.4% (95% CI 41.9% to 94.9%) for children. The use of pain medications increased from 24.8% (95% CI 11.3% to 38.4%) to 69.9% (95% CI 56.7% to 83.1%) for adults and from 27.2% (95% CI 5.7% to 48.8%) to 42.8% (95% CI 18.1% to 67.5%) for children. The proportion of children who received parenteral narcotics (13.7% [95% CI 9.3% to 18.0%]) was less than that of adults (23% [95% CI 18.9% to 27.1%]).

Conclusion

CT use has increased for patients with appendicitis over time, and CBC use remains high. There has been an increase in analgesic administration, but more than half of all patients with appendicitis had not received pain medication over the course of the entire study period. Children received fewer parenteral narcotics than adults and appeared to be preferentially treated with nonparenteral nonnarcotic analgesics.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Supervising editor: David M. Jaffe, MD
 Author contributions: DST, RCM, SA, and JGL conceived and designed the study and performed the interpretation of analysis. LMA and RCM managed the data set, provided statistical consultation about accuracy of the analysis, and performed the analysis. DST drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. DST takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.
 Earn CME Credit: Continuing Medical Education is available for this article at www.ACEP-EMedHome.
 Please see page 396 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
 Provide process.asp?qs_id=7598 on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
 Publication date: Available online July 29, 2011.


© 2012  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 59 - N° 5

P. 395-403 - mai 2012 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Identifying Nontechnical Skills Associated With Safety in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review of the Literature
  • Lynsey Flowerdew, Ruth Brown, Charles Vincent, Maria Woloshynowych
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Can Rapid Viral Testing in the Emergency Department Reduce Antibiotic Use in Children?
  • Lee Wilbur, Rawle A. Seupaul

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.