S'abonner

Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial - 04/01/12

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0 
Dorien C Rijkaart, MD a, Johannes Berkhof, PhD b, Lawrence Rozendaal, MD a, Folkert J van Kemenade, MD a, Nicole WJ Bulkmans, MD a, Daniëlle AM Heideman, PhD a, Gemma G Kenter, ProfMD c, Jack Cuzick, ProfPhD d, Peter JF Snijders, ProfPhD a, Chris JLM Meijer, ProfMD a,
a Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands 
b Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands 
c Centre for Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands 
d Cancer Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof Chris J L M Meijer, VU University Medical Centre, Department of Pathology, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands

Summary

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions than is cytology, but detection of HPV by DNA screening in two screening rounds 5 years apart has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to assess whether HPV DNA testing in the first screen decreases detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or worse, CIN grade 2 or worse, and cervical cancer in the second screening.

Methods

In this randomised trial, women aged 29–56 years participating in the cervical screening programme in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to receive HPV DNA (GP5+/6+-PCR method) and cytology co-testing or cytology testing alone, from January, 1999, to September, 2002. Randomisation (in a 1:1 ratio) was done with computer-generated random numbers after the cervical specimen had been taken. At the second screening 5 years later, HPV DNA and cytology co-testing was done in both groups; researchers were masked to the patient’s assignment. The primary endpoint was the number of CIN grade 3 or worse detected. Analysis was done by intention to screen. The trial is now finished and is registered, number ISRCTN20781131.

Findings

22420 women were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 22518 to the control group; 19999 in the intervention group and 20106 in the control group were eligible for analysis at the first screen. At the second screen, 19579 women in the intervention group and 19731 in the control group were eligible, of whom 16750 and 16743, respectively, attended the second screen. In the second round, CIN grade 3 or worse was less common in the intervention group than in the control group (88 of 19579 in the intervention group vs 122 of 19731 in the control group; relative risk 0·73, 95% CI 0·55–0·96; p=0·023). Cervical cancer was also less common in the intervention group than in the control group (four of 19579 in the intervention group vs 14 of 19731; 0·29, 0·10–0·87; p=0·031). In the baseline round, detection of CIN grade 3 or worse did not differ significantly between groups (171 of 19999 vs 150 of 20106; 1·15, 0·92–1·43; p=0·239) but was significantly more common in women with normal cytology (34 of 19286 vs 12 of 19373; 2·85, 1·47–5·49; p=0·001). Furthermore, significantly more cases of CIN grade 2 or worse were detected in the intervention group than in the control group (267 of 19999 vs 215 of 20106; 1·25, 1·05–1·50; p=0·015). In the second screen, fewer HPV16-positive CIN grade 3 or worse were detected in the intervention group than in the control group (17 of 9481 vs 35 of 9354; 0·48, 0·27–0·85; p=0·012); detection of non-HPV16-positive CIN grade 3 or worse did not differ between groups (25 of 9481 vs 25 of 9354; 0·99, 0·57–1·72; p=1·00). The cumulative detection of CIN grade 3 or worse and CIN grade 2 or worse did not differ significantly between study arms, neither for the whole study group (CIN grade 3 or worse: 259 of 19999 vs 272 of 20106; 0·96, 0·81–1·14, p=0·631; CIN grade 2 or worse: 427 of 19999 vs 399 of 20106; 1·08, 0·94–1·24; p=0·292), nor for subgroups of women invited for the first time (CIN grade 3 or worse in women aged 29–33 years: 102 of 3139 vs 105 of 3128; 0·97, 0·74–1·27; CIN grade 2 or worse in women aged 29–33 years: 153 of 3139 vs 151 of 3128; 1·01, 0·81–1·26; CIN grade 3 or worse in women aged 34–56 years: 157 of 16860 vs 167 of 16978; 0·95, 0·76–1·18; CIN grade 2 or worse in women aged 34–56 years: 274 of 16860 vs 248 of 16978; 1·11, 0·94–1·32).

Interpretation

Implementation of HPV DNA testing in cervical screening leads to earlier detection of clinically relevant CIN grade 2 or worse, which when adequately treated, improves protection against CIN grade 3 or worse and cervical cancer. Early detection of high-grade cervical legions caused by HPV16 was a major component of this benefit. Our results lend support to the use of HPV DNA testing for all women aged 29 years and older.

Funding

Zorg Onderzoek Nederland (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development).

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2012  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 13 - N° 1

P. 78-88 - janvier 2012 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Independent validation of genes and polymorphisms reported to be associated with radiation toxicity: a prospective analysis study
  • Gillian C Barnett, Charlotte E Coles, Rebecca M Elliott, Caroline Baynes, Craig Luccarini, Don Conroy, Jennifer S Wilkinson, Jonathan Tyrer, Vivek Misra, Radka Platte, Sarah L Gulliford, Matthew R Sydes, Emma Hall, Søren M Bentzen, David P Dearnaley, Neil G Burnet, Paul DP Pharoah, Alison M Dunning, Catharine ML West
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Overall efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against grade 3 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA trial
  • Matti Lehtinen, Jorma Paavonen, Cosette M Wheeler, Unnop Jaisamrarn, Suzanne M Garland, Xavier Castellsagué, S Rachel Skinner, Dan Apter, Paulo Naud, Jorge Salmerón, Song-Nan Chow, Henry Kitchener, Júlio C Teixeira, James Hedrick, Genara Limson, Anne Szarewski, Barbara Romanowski, Fred Y Aoki, Tino F Schwarz, Willy A J Poppe, Newton S De Carvalho, Maria Julieta V Germar, Klaus Peters, Adrian Mindel, Philippe De Sutter, F Xavier Bosch, Marie-Pierre David, Dominique Descamps, Frank Struyf, Gary Dubin, for the HPV PATRICIA Study Group ‡

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.