S'abonner

Personal and parental nativity as risk factors for food sensitization - 24/12/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.10.002 
Corinne A. Keet, MD, MS a, , Robert A. Wood, MD b, Elizabeth C. Matsui, MD, MHS a
a Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 
b Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 

Corresponding author: Corinne A. Keet, MD, MS, Johns Hopkins Hospital, CMSC 1102, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21202.

Abstract

Background

Immigrants to developed countries have low rates of aeroallergen sensitization and asthma, but less is known about both food allergy and the role of parental immigration status.

Objective

We sought to evaluate the relationship between personal and parental nativity and the risk of food sensitization.

Methods

Three thousand five hundred fifty subjects less than 21 years old from the Nation Health and Examination Survey 2005-2006 were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated by using logistic regression, which adjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, age, and household income and accounted for the complex survey design. Nativity was classified as US-born or foreign-born, and the age of immigration was estimated. Head-of-household nativity was used as a proxy for parental nativity. Food sensitization was defined as at least 1 specific IgE level of 0.35 kU/L or greater to milk, egg, or peanut. Aeroallergen-specific sensitizations and the presence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or eczema were also assessed.

Results

Compared with those born outside the United States (US), US-born children and adolescents had higher odds of sensitization to any food (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.49-2.83; P < .001). Among the foreign-born group, those who arrived before 2 years of age had higher odds of food sensitization than those who arrived later (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.19-6.08; P = .02). Within the US-born group, in contrast, children of immigrants were at the highest risk (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.05-2.24; P = .02).

Conclusion

Although foreign-born children and adolescents are at lower risk of food sensitization compared with those born in the US, among those born in the US, the children of immigrants are at the highest risk.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Food allergy, food sensitization, immigration, nativity, child, hay fever, asthma, eczema, aeroallergen

Abbreviations used : NHANES, OR, US


Plan


 The study described was made possible by grant no. 1KL2RR025006-01 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on the NCRR is available at www.ncrr.nih.gov/. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from overview-translational.asp.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: C. A. Keet and E. C. Matsui receive research support from the National Institutes of Health. R. A. Wood has consultant arrangements with the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, receives research support from the National Institutes of Health, and is on the Medical Advisory Board for the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network.


© 2011  American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 129 - N° 1

P. 169 - janvier 2012 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Anaphylaxis in a New York City pediatric emergency department: Triggers, treatments, and outcomes
  • Faith Huang, Kanwaljit Chawla, Kirsi M. Järvinen, Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Excellent survival after sibling or unrelated donor stem cell transplantation for chronic granulomatous disease
  • Caridad A. Martinez, Sweta Shah, William T. Shearer, Howard M. Rosenblatt, Mary E. Paul, Javier Chinen, Kathryn S. Leung, Alana Kennedy-Nasser, Malcolm K. Brenner, Helen E. Heslop, Hao Liu, Meng-Fen Wu, Imelda C. Hanson, Robert A. Krance

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.