Preoperative Thienopyridine Use and Outcomes after Surgery: A Systematic Review - 23/12/11

Abstract |
Background |
Although studies have demonstrated excess risk of ischemic events if aspirin is withheld preoperatively, it is unclear whether preoperative thienopyridine use influences postoperative outcomes.
Methods |
We conducted a systematic review of 37 studies (31 cardiac and 6 noncardiac surgery, 3 randomized, 34 observational) comparing postoperative outcomes in patients who were versus were not exposed to thienopyridine in the 5 days before surgery.
Results |
Exposure to thienopyridine in the 5 days preceding surgery (compared with no exposure) was not associated with any reduction in postoperative myocardial infarction (23 studies, 12,872 patients, 3.4% vs 3.0%, odds ratio [OR] 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.34), but was associated with increased risks of stroke (16 studies, 10,265 patients, 1.9% vs 1.4%, OR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.20), reoperation for bleeding (32 studies, 19,423 patients, 4.3% vs 1.8%, OR 2.62; 95% CI, 1.96-3.49), and all-cause mortality (28 studies, 22,990 patients, 3.7% vs 2.6%, OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13-1.69). Results were identical when analyses were restricted to long-term users of thienopyridines who continued versus held the medication in the 5 days before surgery. Although all associations were similar in direction for the subset of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, 97% of the outcome data in this meta-analysis came from cardiac surgery trials.
Conclusions |
These data support withholding thienopyridines 5 days before cardiac surgery; there was insufficient evidence to make definitive recommendations for elective noncardiac surgery although the direction and magnitude of associations were similar.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Surgery, Systematic review, Thienopyridine
Plan
| Funding: There was no project-specific funding, but FAM and SRM are supported by career salary awards from Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions. |
|
| Conflict of Interest: None. |
|
| Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing this manuscript. |
Vol 125 - N° 1
P. 87 - janvier 2012 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
