Relationships between changes in patient-reported health status and functional capacity in outpatients with heart failure - 14/12/11
![](/templates/common/images/mail.png)
Résumé |
Background |
Heart failure trials use a variety of measures of functional capacity and quality of life. Lack of formal assessments of the relationships between changes in multiple aspects of patient-reported health status and measures of functional capacity over time limits the ability to compare results across studies.
Methods |
Using data from HF-ACTION (N = 2331), we used the Pearson correlation coefficients and predicted change scores from linear mixed-effects modeling to demonstrate the associations between changes in patient-reported health status measured with the EQ-5D visual analog scale and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and changes in peak VO2 and 6-minute walk distance at 3 and 12 months. We examined a 5-point change in KCCQ within individuals to provide a framework for interpreting changes in these measures.
Results |
After adjustment for baseline characteristics, correlations between changes in the visual analog scale and changes in peak VO2 and 6-minute walk distance ranged from 0.13 to 0.28, and correlations between changes in the KCCQ overall and subscale scores and changes in peak VO2 and 6-minute walk distance ranged from 0.18 to 0.34. A 5-point change in KCCQ was associated with a 2.50-mL kg−1 min−1 change in peak VO2 (95% CI 2.21-2.86) and a 112-m change in 6-minute walk distance (95% CI 96-134).
Conclusions |
Changes in patient-reported health status are not highly correlated with changes in functional capacity. Our findings generally support the current practice of considering a 5-point change in the KCCQ within individuals to be clinically meaningful.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Leslee J. Shaw, PhD served as guest editor for this article. |
|
Randomized controlled trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00047437. |
|
Funding/support: HF-ACTION was funded by grants 5U01HL063747, 5U01HL066461, 5U01HL068973, 5U01HL066501, 5U01HL066482, 5U01HL064250, 5U01HL066494, 5U01HL064257, 5U01HL066497, 5U01HL068980, 5U01HL064265, 5U01HL066491, and 5U01HL064264 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and grants R37AG018915 and P60AG010484 from the National Institute on Aging. |
Vol 163 - N° 1
P. 88 - janvier 2012 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?